• JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I suppose remote backup is the only option for something that destroys everything in the area, but raid is essential anyway.

    • UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      makes sense, I was hoping for a cheaper answer. Buying land (caz renting a server is the same as cloud storage isn’t it?) somewhere is probly expensive.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you know someone who lives somewhere else and also has a NAS, you can help each other by using each other for remote backup.

        • UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          sadly I don’t, now I need to talk this onto someone… I don’t even know who’d be interested. But great idea, needs a lot of administrative work tho. And also leaving an open (pwd protected, but still an open port) connection to a storage server 24-7 does not sound very safe.

    • koper@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      raid is essential anyway

      Why? If there are offsite backups that can be restored in an acceptable time frame, what’s still the point of RAID?