It’s uneconomic

Except you’re wrong and the court already sided with Tesla.

Why do you care? Truly? I don’t get this logic. Feel free to buy whatever you want, but punishing yourself over some weird concern with a CEO is so strange.

So they ran a test for 0-150-0 and then just omitted the two cars that had by far the best chance of winning? In what world? Low quality journalism.

Are you an electrician? I’m guessing not. Are you going to get bonded and insured? File permits? When you add it all up you’ll realize it’s not THAT lucrative. The fact that you’re asking this though implies you probably shouldn’t be doing it.

Edit: I can’t tell now if you’re actually talking about OPERATING them too? If so, no, it’s not profitable without the land and you’d still need to manage billing.

People just need to buy used cars. It takes time and the economy getting worse.

These vehicles are apples and oranges. Gas will be more expensive than electric. Electric should go down a bit or stay flat as the system delivers more energy.

Why didn’t you use #6 and a 60A breaker or #8 and a 50A. Why a 40A? So confised

Front view nice. Side rear 3/4 not so much. They should have built this first.

No.

Also the charge rate depends on the car. Not all cars do poor over 80%.