

Do you want to be friends and not talk about the outside world ever?


Do you want to be friends and not talk about the outside world ever?


Removed by mod


Being stressed out by the world is unhealthy. Withdrawing from reality to avoid that stress is also unhealthy. The fuck am I supposed to do move to another planet? In this economy?


Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!


Waluigi!


I’m autistic and extremely faceblind and despite this being potentially useful to me personally, I really don’t think this should be legal at all.
I also want to say, don’t let anyone use people like me as a reason why it should be. I dont know what’s scarier to me, being identified accurately by it which, stalkers and abusers will love, or being misidentified by it and experiencing what to me will seems like arbitrary harassment and violence.
Great job Ray-Ban! Really good look! Thanks Meta! Connecting us to people whether we like it or not!


I can’t come up with anything better than anti-social engineering. Id call it prompt engineering but…


Hacking? No no no no. This is social engineering without the other person. It’s anti-social engineering.
I accept this defeat knowing the victor has truly earned it. Iv went plausible as a sentence but I cannot beat a slant rhyme with Cesar Chavez. OH GOD THIS IS WHAT GETTING OLD FEELS LIKE
Caesar has no children
thank you, I seriously appreciate that, and sorry for assuming but theres enough people who do remove attribution I lumped this in. fwiw what I’ll do now is share the link to the original post going forward. im sharing somebody’s work for free I figure it should be attributed to them even if they offer it for free. I gotta reflect on my reaction too
(btw if anyone knows the source some asshat removed the attribution from this and im not about that)
jfc this is so sad because it would actually be hard for a human coder of very little ability to do it this wrong. at least it has its own instance i can block.
Adblocker? Some lists will block dynamic dns providers (badblock for sure has afraid.org). If so you want to exempt that since you legitimately use it.


The Smurfs. 65 minutes of using the word smurf in place of all swearing. Somewhere during the denouement a character should mouth but not say “Oh, fuck!” then two other smurfs are nearby. One says “what did they say?” The other smurf looks panicked and then offers without much conviction: I think it was, “Oh Smurf!” Big laughs. Scene.
Estimated Time: 36 mins… 40 mins? … 12 days!? … 35 mins …
Dr. Teeth has not aged well at all
Intended as a pun on Latavia’s recordings, and that this would arguably be Dick’s Pick, which sounds almost the same as Dick’s Pick’s. I also thought about a dick pic joke but I’ll always choose whatever is most obscure from my perspective
Theres actually a third missing line accounting for the missing 4% (using the numbers at the end) from the sums. That 4% now may have gone up or down in the past but the line weight on their graph would have rendered it as a mostly flattish line near the bottom. This is the moment you either make the editorial choice to omit it, or flip the graph to log scale and incur the burden of explaining that to your audience. I struggle to make this distinction clear to a mostly technical audience so I think the authors/editors probably made the right choice.