…with bombs?

Mostly intended as a joke, though I did read some thing about bombs there.

What’s this, terrorism?

Surprise surprise Lemmy isn’t entirely different from Reddit in that:

• It kills a community over the name of one user (yes I’m aware it was an admin)
• Said admin had beef with this user, which they conveniently left out in their post description
• It’s got shameless hypocrisy too where calls to death from zionism is acceptable but not the other way around

For the record, I am not for calling anyone’s death as that’s not my thing, but have some consistency hypocrites. Smh.

It’s the future the Epstein class are trying to build

If information is the goal I suppose that’d be a win.

Though palantir won’t be stopped, or the rest of big tech, in their corruption so, eh…

The court itself is corrupt. So what?

Remember that the media will suppress these incidents.

Dw they must have been used as human shields by hamas guys /s.

What about her?

Wage wars for the pedophilic Epstein class. God bless America.

Yeah there’s a bit of a selection bias going there as you pointed out (not sure if that’s the exactly accurate term).

Ah yeah

Why is this comment highlighted yellow?

I didn’t say neurotypicals are better at getting by because they ignore their trauma or that they live in a utopia, I said the world is generally less traumatic for neurotypical people.

…you said it was the equivalent of saying “all lives matter”.

It’s traumatic for both but it’s possibly moreso the case for neurodivergent people. They face all of the things you mentioned and more things that neurotypical people dont.

Reduced access to medical care—psychological evaluations and medication, both of which cost money—does impact neurodivergent folk more.

The direct statements I’ve made are directly against that. You’re arguing in bad faith if you’re going to put words in my mouth for me and insist I said what I didn’t.

I can have a discussion about the present without focusing on the past or future. Saying that it is metaphysics is a non-sequitur. Not everything has to be viewed historically.

What you’re doing is you’re using dialectical materialism as a veneer to deflect criticism here.

You’re saying that, why should I believe that’s actually the case?

Censorship is always done with some sort of “positive” narrative tied to it.