Have you taken a look at the plato.stanford.edu entry on such, specifically the bibliography?

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thought-experiment/#Bib

edit:

The number of papers, anthologies, and monographs has been growing immensely since the beginning of the 1990s. It might be useful to highlight that in existing literature, Kühne (2006) remains the most substantial historical study on the philosophical exploration of thought experiments. And Sorensen (1992) remains the most comprehensive philosophical study of thought experiments. More than other monographs both of these studies well exceed the author’s own systematic contribution to what is widely considered the primary epistemological challenge presented by thought experiments. Also, this bibliography does not include the many (we count about eight) popular books on thought experiments (like Wittgenstein’s Beetle and Other Classical Thought Experiments by Martin Cohen); nor do we list fiction that is related to the subject (like The End of Mr. Y by Scarlett Thomas, or God’s Debris by Scott Adams). Further, for undergraduate teaching purposes one might want to consider Doing Philosophy: An Introduction Through Thought Experiments (edited by Theodore Schick, Jr. and Lewis Vaughn, fifth edition, 2012, Boston: McGraw Hill Higher Education), and chapter 5 of Timothy Williamson’s short introduction to philosophical method (Oxford University Press, 2020). Moreover, a number of philosophical journals have dedicated part or all of an issue to the topic of thought experiments, including the Croatian Journal of Philosophy (19/VII, 2007), Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie (1/59, 2011), Informal Logic (3/17, 1995), Philosophica (1/72, 2003), Perspectives on Science (2/22, 2014), Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte (1/38, 2015)), as well as TOPOI (4/38, 2019), HOPOS (1/11, 2021), and Epistemologia (12/2022). Furthermore, a companion to thought experiments exists now: The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments was published in 2017. Each includes substantial state of the art reports.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackout_poetry

!juggalos@lemmy.world

Dude on a skateboard,
Congrats to me my aim scored
Make sure that fool ain’t late
For his date with The Lord
EMT’s on the way
But I reverse the journey
He showed up in the driver’s seat
But left on the gurney

fuck yeah. what’s your favorite track? post a link to it on !juggalos.lemmy.world

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_nOz6LAQIcQC4RfeMpOcQ_OPFzmfGqljz4

you should post that pic and clip to !juggalos@lemmy.world !

this is awesome fam, you should post it to !juggalos@lemmy.world !

There’s only one way to be sure. You and your Bible study group must listen to their every single album.

That sounds an awful lot like “don’t do anything that might upset the Christians.”

FWIW I interpreted this as unironically uplifting, along the lines of “Where the Wild Things Are”.

That is one big pile of AI.

We post a lot of Bandcamp links on !gothindustrial@lemmy.world because the free song streaming is great and a lot of bands are on there. Eventually they’ll enshittify and get rid of the free streaming or require a signin at which point I’ll move on to something else (dunno what?!)

Agreed. fwiw Bandcamp is currently kinda like that for their digital tracks tho it was bought out a couple years ago so will begin enshittifying any day now…

This graph will live forever, in intro classes, as an example of how not to do things.

Today I learned that in Sweden, Donald Duck’s name is Karl “Kalle” Magnus Anka.

I believe Donald Duck is pretty popular in Southern Europe too, especially Italy. I learned to read Italian from a hoard of old Paperinos / Topolinos a neighbor had.

“Who will simp the Simpsons?” -Juvenal, probably

See, when I was in grad school I once had to calculate an agreement metric from a bunch of labels on a corpus. No problem I said, the math is easy, I can write a script in an hour or so. Fam that mfing script took me two freaking days bc there were always some little bugs or weird edge cases I hadn’t thought of. So the deal I made with myself was: I would use Matlab or a stats library or something like that, BUT I would make sure that I understood the math beforehand.

But for whatever reason, I never had to calculate a standard deviation. Thinking about it, someone else might have done that for papers I was co-author on, though.

I’ve worked as a scientist for around 10 years (and as a research programmer in various labs for 5-6 years before that) and have never done a standard deviation calculation.

“Do you love being a scientist? Or do you love the IDEA of being a scientist?” - something I’ve been thinking a lot about recently…

with a few simple changes, this coulda been Loss.