• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    But but but I won’t vote in protest!1 That will definitely make them listen! (/s)

    PSA: Not voting means you have the relevance of an old man yelling at a cloud.

    You move the Overton window by voting. You want policy #857? You have to vote for policy #1 first. You have to walk before you can run.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I just want one of the “You can’t vote for Biden!” people to outline what I should do instead. What’s the play here? Dismantle the government? Sure, outline your plan and let’s see if it has any merit. Protest? Great, tell me when and where but it doesn’t preclude the need to vote.

      They talk big, but if their entire plan begins with “don’t vote” and ends with “bitch about it online” then it’s not a great plan.

          • Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Because a First-Past-The-Post voting system doesn’t care about your ideals. Until we have a different system, literally your only hope of effecting change is to vote for one of the two partied candidates and work locally to influence your party from the bottom-up.

            Voting third party doesn’t send a message you want it to send. It doesn’t send any message at all except “I approve of whatever you choose for me.”

          • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Because capitalism profits from genocide. The question then is, are you ok with diet Palestinian genocide or would you prefer the supersized Palestinian genocide combo with a side of homegrown genocide?

          • john89@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            8 months ago

            There are 2 sets of voters in this nation.

            Those who want to solve the problems we face, and those who just want to kick the can down the road for someone else while rich people get richer.

            If you vote for republicans or democrats, you’re in the latter camp.

            It really puts things into perspective when you think about it like this.

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              If you want to move the Overton window, you vote. That’s the perspective you need.

              • bamboo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                The Overton window is not something that can be changed electorally. Candidates can only get on the ballot in the first place if they’re within the Overton window, as anybody outside the window is “radical” or “extreme”, and the existing political powers forbid their candidacy. The electoral window is moved outside the electoral process, and only then can the electoral system permit new candidates with new ideas.

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Lol yes it can. Why are we having idiotic discussion to disband the EPA? Because Trump won an election. That moved the Overton window, drastically at that. Why can’t Biden do ______? Because the Republicans still have a very real chance of winning. When the GOP has no chance of winning, then the Overton window can move more.

                  • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    When the GOP has no chance of winning, then the Overton window can move more.

                    Then Biden should be listening to the people he’s depending on to get re-elected.

                • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  So… were just ignoring the current candidates? And the current debates and policies that each have pushed?

              • john89@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yeah. You need to vote for candidates that don’t just look out for rich people.

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  How do you get that? By moving the Overton window. And how do you get that? By VOTING. But it seems you want to yell at a cloud instead. Something tells me you’ll just keep at this ‘whoo is me’, so I’m out.

                  • Facebones@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Wrong. The party that can “move left” went to court to assert their right to do what they want regardless of voters, and have an equal hand in moving the goalposts anytime a third party comes close to the requirements for inclusion. Hell, just look at their messaging - they don’t even talk about Republicans or their policies, they just namedrop trump then blame leftists for all their woes.

                    “MoVe ThE oVeRtOn WiNdOw (even though they openly and pointedly snipped completely off anything left of mid right genocide Joe)”

                    The answer is guillotines and anyone who says otherwise are well off liberals who would rather have Trump than redistribute wealth and resources.

                  • john89@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    I said “we need to vote for candidates that don’t just look out for rich people.”

              • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                8 months ago

                Meanwhile, the Overton window has been shifting right radically. Seems like this lesser of two evils nonsense is actually doing the opposite of what you claim.

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Moved because Trump won an election. But you want to suggest that’s just random? C’mon.

                  *Btw it’s moving the Overton window, not lesser of two evils as you want to put it. You want policy number 426? You have to vote for policy 1 first. You have to walk before you can run.

                  • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    What are you talking about? We have been moving rightward ever since the Clinton administration, baring a handful of social issues. Are you genuinely telling me that we are more left leaning now than we were under the new deal politics before Reagan?

                    All we’ve progressed in is gay and civil rights, which is good. Economically and by most other metrics, we’ve slid Faaaaar to the right.

                    It’s not a good look for your position on slow incremental change that the entire apparatus can collapse in one election.

            • Ledivin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              What problem do you believe you’re solving by making it easier for Trump to take office?

              Are you offended that women still have some control over their reproductive health, and you need to see that eroded further?

              Is it a problem that we aren’t allowed to sexually assault people without repurcussion?

              Do you see issues with people still being allowed to vote?

              Do you hate legal immigrants, which have consistently lost rights and been victimized by the Republican party over the past few administrations?

              Do you dislike your ability to relatively-freely travel abroad, due to our many alliances?

              Do you wish we had a giant wall that has been proven ineffective by virtually every single study on the subject, including GOP-backed ones?

              Do you wish we were helping Israel commit genocide even harder than they already are?

              • john89@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                My issue is that while we squabble over social issues, the ruling class fucks us with fiscal ones.

                Greed and the growing disparity in wealth is the worst issue we face as a species.

                If Biden wins we lose. If Trump wins we lose harder. Each option results in a loss because we don’t want actually want to address the disparity in wealth.

                • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  If Biden wins we lose. If Trump wins we lose harder.

                  …and you think we need to lose harder?

                  Or do you actually believe that the system that has had the same outcome literally every single election has a chance to produce a different result? How many third-party candidates have received more than 1.5% of the vote? I’ll help: exactly FOUR in the past HUNDRED YEARS.

                  Or do you actually just want Trump to win and are using your enlightened centrist persona to disguise that fact?

                  • john89@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    I think a slow loss is still a loss and we shouldn’t cheer when people like Biden get elected over people like Bernie.

                    If you notice, the disparity in wealth is still growing at an increasing-rate. That’s why “the economy is doing good.” Not for me or you. But for the rich people who control who we can vote for.

                    The minuscule amount of support for third parties exemplifies the number of people who actually want to reduce the disparity in wealth.

                    It really puts into perspective who is a useful idiot, and who is not.

            • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              You are truly privileged that you don’t need to worry about more utterly corrupt Fundamentalists on SCOTUS.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              8 months ago

              Self-righteous bullshit. I want to solve problems someday and that’s precisely why I vote for Democrats. Letting Trumpists take over now will make any progress vastly harder for the foreseeable future.

              • john89@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                8 months ago

                You’re one of the latter.

                Let me know when democrats start supporting policies that reduce the disparity in wealth.

                We saw everything we needed to see with Bernie. Neither establishment party cares about regular, working class people.

                • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Ah, so since one of your two options doesn’t give you everything you want, you’ve decided that you’re okay with the one that wants to take away everything you have. Cool story, good luck with that.

                  • john89@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    No, it doesn’t have to be everything I want.

                    It has to be supporting policies that reduce the disparity in wealth, not exacerbate it.

                    Looking at how many people actually vote for 3rd parties puts into perspective how many people actually want to solve this issue.

                    Also, try letting people use their own words. You were wrong about your assumptions and hyperbole, but i think instead of admitting you’re wrong you’re just going to assume more.

                • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Let me know when another party gets more than a single digit percent of the vote.

                  • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    We’re working on it. Demonstrating the Democratic party is no longer viable is our current strategy.

                    But, you know if moderate and liberal voters wanted to show up in force at these protests that might not be necessary.

      • Ioughttamow@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Let’s vote for trump and get some American boots on the ground! Can’t let the IDF take all of the glory!

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You misspelled Netanyahu. Also you will have egg on your face from head to toe when you find out what Biden is really doing to stop the killing in the Mideast.

          • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Is it fair to say that the overton window is only moving right when we are still making progress moving it left?

            The overton window isn’t a zero-sum measure. It can expand simultaneously in both directions. Given that we have nazis in the street now, I’d say it’s not correct to say that it’s moving only left either.

        • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That has little to do with whatever political machinations are occurring and more to do with housing and necessities inflation driving labor pressure as a lagging inflation indicator.

          Think of it as a tectonic/landscape thing rather than the stupid games people happen to be playing on the landscape.

          Of course if any of them had their heads out of their own asses, or the asses of their owners, they might recognize this and start adapting…

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lol you think Biden is right of Trump. Right well thank you for letting me know I don’t have to reply any further.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I could sus it like you think Biden moved it right (lol), but that requires you ignore Trump would have actually moved it rght, which is exactly the Overton window is moving it as left as you can every step, but why the fuck am I bothering even with this you’ll just say but but but but but but Biden bad! I’m out.