• intrepid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    306
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can you imagine the amount of corruptive influences and persuasions he is resisting?

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    207
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s kinda sad that without Mozilla, Raymond, the NoScript guys and TOR we would lose control over the internet pretty much immediately

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      7 months ago

      Kind of agree. Though there is pi-hole and several others. And there’s i2p, Freenet (now called Hyphanet) and GNUnet, and similar.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        7 months ago

        Pi-hole is nice for devices that you don’t fully control. But it’s not enough, due to the fundamental limitations of DNS based blocking. If the ads and the content are hosted on the same domain, it can’t do anything.

        • micka190@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Also issues with links that get ads on top of them. You can still click them, you’ll get redirected to a blank page (because the ad gets DNS blocked), but with an adblocker you would’ve gone to the non-ad link.

    • h05@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I definitely agree, although really a LOT of non-Linux/(IT) guys use Chrome, some even Edge, if on Windows

      • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        IT person…

        Uses chrome…

        Both cannot be true friend, sorry. Your buddy is either a fake engineer or their main job isn’t IT.

        If you really have friends in IT they haven’t used chrome or edge in a while, or their using the scripting bot for weekly progress reports to their boss, and they’re only using it for that…

        • olutukko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          this is the stupidest comment I have read all week. chromenis fucking INFESTED in IT field. literally almost everyone uses it in my class, I’m a third year student in ict-engineering. literally everyone used it in my last school too, which was also IT related. if you actually believe that you must not really see other IT people outside the linux circles

          • menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Chrome has become the baseline to support for every kind of web application out there since every major browser other than firefox and safari is a chrome reskin anyway

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          You don’t want to start this conversation, it’s a race to absolutism and purity tests at odds with one another. You say Firefox and someone comes in a calls you an idiot because you’re not using a fully FOSS browser or one that is inadequately hardened or one that supports the installation of content-management modules.

  • DivineDev@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    ·
    7 months ago

    If only, I know so many people who don’t bother with adblocking at all. I honestly have no idea how they use the Internet without going mad

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      209
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      My kid discovered that he can hit the “report” button on the YouTube app on the TV to skip the ads immediately. So now every ad gets reported as “inappropriate”.

      I’m proud of him.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I found out this trick when I eating dinner once at my local library. Oddly, it was a kid came up and saw I was watching YT videos. Showed me the tactic, and now I rely on it lol

    • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m of two minds about people not adblocking.

      On one hand: Ads are gross noise pollution, and people are increasingly unaware of all the noise around them (or the noise they’re generating) largely because they’ve been passively trained to “tune out” ads. Also consumerism.

      On the other hand: As long as there are a significant amount of people oblivious to the possibility of adblock, corporate ad mobsters and the other worst people in the world out there will largely leave those of us blocking their ads alone. If everyone ran adblockers, we’d definitely live in a world of WEI… and probably worse. So, maybe all those people are watching ads so that I don’t have to, as the YouTube thumbnails say.

      • anothermember@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        If sites wanted to run ads and host them locally without tracking that would be fine. But since they’re tracking users it’s essential to block them for privacy and security, and if someone isn’t then maybe they don’t understand the level of tracking involved. We need a better name than adblocking.

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      People just don’t know, I’ve been showing my wife the way little by little and she’s always blown away

      • Damage@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve shown a colleague after seeing him browse an horrendous fantasy football website. He couldn’t believe the difference between before and after.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I also don’t understand it. But now I am wondering if we would not have had those “careless” (indifferent ? ignorant ?) millions of people not blocking ads then Google and others may have started pushing anti-adblock measures years earlier, no ?

    • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      The way people talk about people who don’t block ads is so funny.

      I understand and respect the reasons people choose to use blockers, but ads honestly just aren’t that problematic for me in practice and are easy to avoid and ignore.

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ads have been known to contain drive-by malware. Even if you don’t mind seeing ads (which personally I don’t mind unless they’re very intrusive), an adblocker is important for online safety.

        • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Drive-by malware tends not to be zero-days though. I’ve stayed safe for decades just by keeping my software up to date.

            • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              There’s no mention of anything like zero-days in that article. They only mention that it can target all major OSes, with no mention of cutting edge versions also being vulnerable.

              Hilariously, the article directly supports my position as well:

              The good news for some, at least: it likely poses a minimal threat to most people, considering the multi-million-dollar price tag and other requirements for developing a surveillance campaign using Sherlock

              That’s a big part of my whole point. People who don’t do even a modicum of actual thought about a practical threat model for themselves love pretending that ad blocking isn’t primarily just about not wanting to see ads.

              If Israel or some other highly capable attacker is coming after you, then fine, you really do need ad blocking. In that case malware in ads is going to be the least of your concerns.

              Attacks that cast such a wide net as to be the concern of all web users are necessarily less dangerous because exploits need to be kept secret to avoid being patched.

              There’s nothing wrong with taking extra precautions; I’m certainly not saying blocking ads is a bad idea. It’s the apparent confusion that an informed, tech-savvy person might choose not to block ads that makes me laugh.

        • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Of course; I’m just a lot more worried about the systemic problems of mass surveillance than any practical risk to me individially.

        • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You say with such confidence. Is it so hard to imagine people can defend themselves with means other than ad blocking?

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Please tell me what other ways you can block ads other than ignoring them or not visiting the web at all.

            Btw: Custom apps (like it was for Reddit) don’t count.

            • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Huh? The point of this discussion is that I don’t need to block them to keep myself safe in sketchy corners of the web.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      In the 1999s-2000s we used WebWasher. It was basically a proxy server which you ran locally on your computer and it had all the filters. You just set up your browser’s network connection to point to WebWasher and it acted as the gateway to the Internet.

      If browsers somehow decided to kill all their plugin support, you could still use that to filter your content.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    7 months ago

    Seriously. Says a lot about the modern internet, though. Both good and bad.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 months ago

    He’s far too kind of a person. He doesn’t accept any donations for the many years of a better and safer internet experience I’ve gotten from his work

    • max_adam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      When YouTube was blocking ublock people was surprised that they couldnt donate to the project.

  • Shape4985@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    Im genuinely so thankful for this project, the creator and maintainers. You are doing the lords work.

  • Uhrbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    There is something very wrong when deleting 50% of wep page is the least it takes to make the internet usable…