• Johanno@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Problem with that is that in comparison the alternative to CFC was not that more expensive and then a cheaper one was invented shortly after.

    For climate change you basically can double our energy costs and therefore double the cost of almost everything.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not to seem callous, but the first world could learn to live off of a little less.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        8 months ago

        Honestly this is what I keep saying and everyone gets pissed when I do.

        There’s enough resources on this planet that every living human could live a decently luxurious life. But because we allow a small handful of us to hoard all those resources we have poverty on a global scale.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Whoa there buddy. That would put my butler’s butler out of a job. Also where does a person park their yacht if not inside another, larger yacht?

      • bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It wouldn’t even be less. We’d just have to reign in the capitalist feeding frenzy a bit.

        2000 brands of shoes? Advertising? 99% of our production is wasted.

    • r1veRRR@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      But that isn’t true anymore, right? Renewables are now way cheaper per produced Watt. And still, we’re stuck with people pretending that’s not true.

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Currently they are cheaper despite the financial support for fossils but back then it was not and not enough was spent on research