• Blackbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    He’s a fighter. He fights everyone, about everything. I think that’s the crux of it.

    Over the 1990s and 2000s these people were completely and utterly forgotten. Textiles, mines, manufacturing plants, they shuttered over and over and over and over again, and their children moved to big cities en masse. Their small cities and rural towns went from being on a growth trajectory (everything was on that trajectory between WWII and NAFTA) to being on a path to contraction and decay. Over that time they got madder, and madder, and madder, and madder, and they watched the Republican party (the one who at least paid lip service to “small government” and “traditional values”) lean harder and harder into corporatism. They were promised good things over and over and over again, and they were constantly pandered to, then lied to, and then ignored. Wash, rinse, repeat.

    Well, Trump was the first one who didn’t talk, act, and think like the other guys. He wasn’t a politician, and that’s a great thing because (as they’d all come to agree) politicians are lying scum. So then not only was he willing to fight ferociously for them (and only them), he was willing to spit in the face of the people who lied to them all those years. And those political figures started to look like whiny little children when they stepped up and started saying, “hey, he’s lying to you!” The voters’ response was, “yeah? so the fuck what! you did too!”

    He flips the system on its head, and he exposes politicians for what they are, because he’s exactly like them but he doesn’t give a fuck about playing the political game. To them, this is a godsend (literally). It’s the first crack in the political system that gave them any kind of sustained, meaningful authority to push back both politically and culturally, and he delivered a court system that’ll now push the entire country to the right over the next few decades. They simply don’t care about the democratic institutions he’s destroying, because they never helped the rural folk anyway.

    Note: I don’t personally agree with much of this nonsense, and I think it’s a lot like shooting yourself in the face to cure a hangnail, but I’m just giving you a sense of how they look at it, and why he’s so weirdly transcendent to them. He’s a rich, connected insider, who decided to burn the system down from the inside.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        And dementedly burning down everything one sees and grabbing pussies doesn’t make one “a fighter” - just a narcissistic asshole criminal.

        Hooray what a hero.

        Even if I grant all the arguments are true for the sake of discussion, the fact that they’ve seen how incompetent and ridiculously stupid he is for FOUR YEARS not to mention he tried to destroy their fucking government and they’re all “yay we upset city people” Okay Granpa Jones but that makes you objectively a complete fucking asshole moron and your continued support of this rapist fraud criminal is not helping you in any way at any level. Try again. Got someone smart? Articulate? Anyone? We’re open - any age, any gender, any race - anyone? No? This guy huh. He’s your guy is he. Yeah.

        That’s what we thought.

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          But they didn’t see who he was. Their news media fed them a different story about liberals getting in his way and the immigrants making things worse and the government not letting him fix things. It’s all the “lazy” city people voting for big government handouts that’s making the world worse.

          Anything he’'s accused of is just liberal politics and a hoax.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          And dementedly burning down everything one sees and grabbing pussies doesn’t make one “a fighter”

          Yeah it does.

          Like, by definition. He fights.

      • nymwit@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not about facts though. They didn’t logically choose to support him based on facts, figures, and results. It’s all feelings.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a good explanation. And it confirms the core nihilism motivating these voters. “Burn it all down” is an abdication of responsibility and self-infantilizing by forcing that responsibility on everyone else.

      Their frustration and motivation, while I can understand it, is an insult to those of us continuing to keep it together as they make everything worse.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Burn it all down” is an abdication of responsibility and self-infantilizing by forcing that responsibility on everyone else.

        Left wing doomers and “revolutionaries”: sweats profusely

    • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wasn’t the first, Ross Perot had a huge following here in rural Utah for that very reason.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If only there was a group of people who told us neoliberalism and NAFTA would be disastrous!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Seattle_WTO_protests

      Since NAFTA, Americans have watched the economy grow, but its stability plummet.

      https://depts.washington.edu/wtohist/testimonies/comesatime.htm

      Interesting reflection in today’s world where we keep getting told that the current administration has done great for the economy, and yet the wealth devide keeps growing, and more and more people are living paycheck to paycheck.

      There’s an also an interesting linguistic difference that is very noticeable between this movement and today’s repercussions of the inaction that followed. While in English we often speak of “anti-globalization” in French they say “alter-mondialisation”. A different globalization instead of against globalization. The French term much better described the left wing movement of the time, while the media only spoke of anti-globalization which now became a calling cry of the right.

      Fun fact, a Twitter was originally conceptualized as a result of the 1999 protests^1 due to the difficulties and successes people on the streets had with coordinating via SMS (which at the time was rather new and novel).


      Anyhow, I guess we should all vote for the neoliberal again, surely that will fix it!

      [1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3485447.3512282

      • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, you’re not wrong. I think Trump’s ascendancy represents the collapse of the neoliberal consensus of the late 20th century. Where we go from here is anyone’s guess, but the fact that both the left and right are screaming about the evils of neoliberalism means that there’s now a bipartisan coalition willing to dismantle the institutions that arose out of that consensus. It’s a loose coalition, to be sure, and each wing is arguing for fundamentally different futures, but they’re still targeting the same players, and new economic models are now en vogue and within the realm of possibility. Just sucks that one of them is outright fascism.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The two also have been fundamental in establishing those policies.

          Reganomics/Thatcherism is just as much to blame.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        and yet the wealth devide keeps growing, and more and more people are living paycheck to paycheck.

        I’m actually go with “you are wrong”. Under Biden, the wealth gap has grown in absolute dollars, but only because the wealthy had so much more to start with. Lower income families saw much higher percentage growth in wealth and income. Mathematically, it will take a long time for lower income families to catch up, but this is a good trend.

        https://www.stlouisfed.org/open-vault/2024/feb/us-wealth-inequality-widespread-gains-gaps-remain