• areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Out of curiosity what is this system you are describing called? I am guessing it’s not truly socialism if it allows for entrepreneurship. I have to say I’ve not run into this exact system before. Would I be correct in thinking that unlike in market socialism it’s possible to directly own parts of a business you don’t work for or are a customer for?

    • J Lou@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The system is usually called economic democracy because it democratizes the economic sphere. All firms in economic democracy are required to be worker coops. As a result, voting shares are exclusively held by those that are actually working the firm. Non-voting preferred stock can be free floating property rights that can be held by outside investors. it is democratic because only the people actually governed in the firm (i.e. workers) have voting rights over management

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wouldn’t that allow people to profit who put in no work? I think this becomes a moral issue on some level as I don’t generally agree with people making money off of the work of others.

        • J Lou@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The payment to investors in this case isn’t based on a non-worker solely appropriating the fruits of labor. The payment is satisfaction of the liability workers jointly appropriate as part of the negative product. Paying covers the costs of the negative product. It is compensation to the investors for the capital they supplied and the work they did building up that much capital @lemmyshitpost