• Gabu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re a mammal, a rat is a mammal - should we just consider you the same as a rat?

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      But we aren’t chimps, and you shouldn’t judge the effectiveness of economic structures on what chimps do.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nor should you pretend that we’re not apes, and that ape behaviour has no relevance to humans.

        • Gabu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It has about as much relevance as the behavior of any other mammal, circling back to my comment about rats.

        • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          We could study what various apes do, and try to use that to guess at possible human behaviour - or we could literally just look at human behaviour directly. Surely the direct observations of what humans do is going to give us a more accurate and useful model of human behaviour compared to observations of other species.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            or we could literally just look at human behaviour directly.

            And when we do, we’ll discover that in many ways it’s similar to how other apes behave.

            Surely knowing that the behaviour is so ingrained that it’s also how apes behave makes it clear that it’s not some easy thing to change.