• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        111
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Completely abandoned their original hobbyist customer base and sent all their inventory to B2B sales channels and scalpers for several years.

        And now that they’re finally providing B2C vendors with stock, they’ve jacked up the prices by 100% to 300%.

        Don’t forget the Raspberry Pi foundation was supposed to be a nonprofit and the only reason they’re the premier SBC is the community. Other boards have better specs, at a better price, with better features. The community support, the hobbyists, are the primary reason why they are what they are.

        That’s just one bad action, but their had been plenty others recently. Some other comments here have provided information you should read, such as hiring police officers who specialized in using Pi’s for surveillance…

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’ve been feeling this as well. I’m not too into the Pis but I have one on my shelf for a “one day” project. Looking at the pi5 it’s way too expensive I feel like it’s lost its true niche and sold out being “too mainstream”

          I need to look further into single chip computer things cause I’ve seen some competitors come out on my feeds. Hoping there’s an affordable alternative to the Pi5 that beings back the Pi3 feeling.

        • twei@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Tbh I can understand why they dedicated all of their stock to industrial customers instead of individuals. If back then they’d put all of their stock on the open market, it would’ve been scalped instantly. But what’s even more important is that there are businesses who’s products rely on the Pi being available, and tbh I’d rather have businesses using a Pi for their products instead of having to switch to a proprietary solution that nobody can service in 5 years.

          Also: if you ever really needed a pi, you could’ve asked them via e-mail and they’d hook you up with one or a couple

          • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The issue was they didn’t direct the stock to the industry. They directed the stock to large customers and the small companies had no inventory at all for years or were squeezed (by the market) to the limit with a Pi4 going for $200 and more instead of $50.

            The Pi CEO already went out in an interview and was like we did the right thing and would do it again. As such it was pathetic (to me) when they launched the Pi5 and were like community first. To be honest, they probably know that they need initial community support/software packages to sell it to their primary customer: Big companies.

        • DanForever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          The price is more or less the same as it’s always been, where is this nonsense 300% coming from? Are you quoting scalper prices as retail?

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I’ve bought, owned, and used, Pi’s since the original. The Raspberry Pi 5 is the first version that I will not purchase and deploy, so fuck off with your bullshit and go back to shilling for YouTube advertisers, or whatever other corporate interest tickles your fancy, just take it somewhere else.

  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The 3B+ was probably the high of the raspberry pi. It is still pretty much unrivaled in terms of idle power consumption and energy efficiency (or at least i have not seen any other SBC that got below 0.5 Watts on idle) on the consumer market.

    But i have trouble investing further into them.

    1. They do not post any update guides for newer Debian releases and basically only support new deployments.
    2. It looks like they are abandoning their older products. vcgencmd for example is still broken on the 3B+. Since they “fixed” it for the 4B. See https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/issues/1224
    • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      I agree that the 3B+ was the best Pi but for other reasons:

      • The Pi 3B+ had the perfect balance between performance and price with the performance being good enough at the time.
      • Design flaws at launch. Remember the Pi4 CC1 & CC2? POE getting pulled from the market?
      • Pi5: 5V 5A USB-C??? There is now 45W USB-PD (@15V) that would be compatible with generic PSUs but they went proprietary with 5A@5V.
      • They put big customers first and let everybody else starve during the shortage. This forced me to alternatives and I have to say they work just as good and cost less.
      • Jacking up retail prices: Even Intel x86 is now cheaper than a Raspberry Pi.
      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago
        • Pi5: 5V 5A USB-C??? There is now 45W USB-PD (@15V) that would be compatible with generic PSUs but they went proprietary with 5A@5V.

        Was not even thinking about that. Implementing USB-PD is so easy these days. Basically just putting a chip there who handles the PD and then a step down(or whatever) converter which they already have anyway. (See ebay USB PD trigger for implementations)

        That is so dump.

        Talking about hardware flaws, i think they even fucked up the USB-C implementation on the PI 4. They put the resistor on the wrong pins or somthing. Dont remeber exactly.

        • thundermoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think operating at 5V input might be a technical constraint for them. Compatibility revisions for existing hardware are a lot more difficult if the input voltage is 9x higher. Addressing that isn’t as easy as slapping a buck converter on the board.

          Not saying requiring 5A was the right call, just that I can see reasons for not using USB-PD.

          • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            We are not talking about 9 times higher. 3A at 9V would be enough.

            I am currently looking in the Docs and it is really confusing. It states that the PI 5 has a PMIC on board but still saying it boots up only when the 5A is present… So not sure what is going on here.

            And looking at the PD 3.1 standard it looks like 5V 5A is actually in the spec in the new Version…

            Will have to get my hands on the new PD 3.1 spec.

        • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          They used 1 resistor for CC1 and CC2. The fix and correct implementation was to use one resistor per CC-line (two in total).

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Picked up a laptop with a busted screen $30 cheaper than the RPI 5. 1135G7, 8gb upgradable ram, m.2 storage, wifi, bluetooth and a battery.

        Raspberry pis’ were great early on, but their appeal has quickly diminished in my eyes considering used hardware options that are available now.

        Size would be the one redeeming quality of a raspberry pi for me, my headless laptop is thin but takes up substantially more space.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Pi 5 sucks massive balls.

    They now require a special power supply for it to work else it just crashes under load. Their use of USB C is insanely confusing because it doesn’t work with any normal USB C psu.

    This power supply costs 15 bucks which conveniently isn’t included in the price. Also a heat sink that costs 6 bucks.

    Also they stuck with micro hdmi which sucks. (even more special accessories needed)

    The required accessories almost cost as much as just an old pi.

    I hope the community jumps over to Rockchip based boards soon. Pi has taken the communities open source efforts and spit in their face.

    Risc5 is also interesting but that seems to be a far bigger task since it need recompilation of a lot of existing stuff

    • shea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wow, at the start of this comment i thought you were just being overly negative, but one by one, each point crushed me a little more. it’s so sad what’s become of this once great little product. The special power supply is a complete and total deal breaker for so many reasons. that eliminated so many use cases for me. And the lack of a standard hdmi port (or even usb c video output) is just the shtty cherry on top.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah power seems like such a small thing but for an SBC it’s a pretty big deal.

        The power usage is also pretty crushing for it the Pi’s usage in hobby Robotics. Finally we have some computing power but now it’s unusable because how are you going to get 5V5A from a powerbank? We could power the Pi4 from a decent USB C supporting powerbank, But this is no longer the case for the Pi5.

        If they supported “normal” USB PD then at least a powerbank with quick-charge support (9v3a) would work and give you the same total 25W wattage. And the PD USB chargers would have been way cheaper because 9v3A get mass produced. This 5V5A is some Apple tier of “propriatary” standard and I really wonder why they did it.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Even the recommended 5V3A supply for the Pi4 is non-standard and requires you to either buy the official power brick or wade through a sea of sketchy Chinese knockoffs that may or may not deliver their rated power. I don’t understand why they haven’t explored alternative connectors or slapped a voltage regulator on the board in order to use a 12V supply. 5V5A USB is just ridiculous. USB only makes sense when you’re using universal requirements, but this might as well be a barrel connector as you can’t use any normal USB charger with it.

        • DanForever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          But it does support usb pd, starting with pi 5, you can use any usb pd power source, so long as it can provide the needed wattage

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I refuse to admit 5v5a is USB PD. This is like USB3.1gen2by4 Rev 9001

            USB PD was meant for

            15w = 5v3a

            30w = 9v3a

            45w =15v3a

            60-100w = 20v3-5a

            Phones that wanted to do it different made up their own name with blackjack and WOOX charging. I don’t need the Pi foundation single handedly screwing this up.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is there a RasPi alternative that’s competitive in price and has PCI-e support? It’s been a dream project of mine for quite some time to pair an ultra low power SoC to a GPU in order to make a crazy overpowered Folding@Home or BOINC cluster.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I could say the Orange Pi 5, however Orange Pi’s ports currently tend to only work with specific accessories which they already wrote drivers for themselves. It’s not like they’re blocking other devices, but just like how RPI still needs a lot of work to support GPU’s with drivers, Orange Pi probably needs even more.

        The integrated GPU is pretty good though.

        Most alternatives to RPI use a Rockchip such as the RK3566 for mid range and RK3588 for high end stuff.

        There’s also the new cheap 15 bucks LuckFox Pico with Rockchip RV1106 with a small NPU for AI projects, kind of a Pi Pico alternative.

        • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’d recommend Orange Pi 5 plus. It’s much more expandable than OP 5.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Id recommend avoiding Orange anything until they can unfuck their flashing software.

            Fucking windows-only chinese shitwear. Fuck Orange Pi. I’ll never buy another one.

        • InputZero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Thank you for your recommendation. I’ve looked at some of those SoCs and they’re impressive but none of them do what I’m looking for. I want to make a graveyard for my old GPUs, but without the power overhead I have right now with them configured as essentially a mining rig that’s folding proteins instead of guessing the hash. I understand that the potential power saved by using ARM or RISC over x86/64 is a few dozen watts at best and chosing an SoC over a desktop platform hamstrings any opportunity for scaling, but it’s been a dream project of mine for quite some time. It doesn’t have to be practical.

          Whenever I am doing different projects I go with RasPi alternatives. I agree they’re cheaper and superior.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Low end Intel like Gracemount N200 are lower power and higher performance than Raspberry Pi.

            Even an old JasperLake is like 24 watts max to Pi5’s 27 watts.

    • snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      What non standard thing are they doing with the power supply? The PSU looks like a regular usb c PD supply to me (even supports 12v, nice!)

      Edit: wtf! 5v@5a yeah thats non standard. What were they thinking?

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m assuming it’s like the Nintendo switch USBC lead which technically is standard but doesn’t really work to charge anything else. but at least you can use normal USBC leads to charge the switch so it’s not too bad.

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think pi is on the road to mainstream. Probably time to shift to an open source hardware competitor to boost it. Not saying pi is bad, I have one and its great. Those like me who love tinkering should consider going the extra mile and „radicalize“ themselves to open hardware. The project I hear the most of is Banana-PI. https://www.banana-pi.org

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Most alternatives use Rockchips such as Rk3566 or 3588 which are better in every way to the Pi chips of their respective price points. As long as they don’t use the Allwinner chips it’s usually decent out of the box but still a bit lacking.

      I like Orange Pi more. They have pretty good out of the box documentation and a good range of hardware.

      Radxa is also an option but they seem to offer the same stuff as Orange Pi but more expensive.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thank you very much for pointing this out! It seems I‘ll have to read up on this stuff for my next home automation project.

      • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I used a lepotato on my last project in place of a pi3 but libre computer totally has rockchip boards available as well. Price wise seemed decent, documentation was decent enough for me and more importantly I could actually get one.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Does it have dual band wifi, wide software support, dual 4k output at 60hz, 4gb of ddr4, NVME support via addon?

      Your cheap thin client likely isn’t a modern computer. The PI 5 is, and costing another $30 isnt exactly a roaring failure.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        4GB of DDR4 is a lot worse than 8GB of DDR3. Those (slightly) older business SFF computers are plenty capable compared to the pi and their software support is at least as strong.

        You’re also going to have to add several peripherals to the pi that aren’t included in the price.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s pretty good ddr4, but okay. You can have 8Gb of ddr4 for another $20. Not exactly a bank burner for a server or client.

          How about the other features? Does that 8GB ddr3 computer have dual band wifi? Dual monitor 4k support at 60hz? Native hardware hevc/vp9 decoding?

          Id love to see a link to these $30 PC people are talking about. Even older SFF aren’t going for $30 generally, unless youre buying in lots.

          Can you beat a raspi 5 with a recent-ish SFF going for $200? You bet, but that flips the “pi is bad value for the money” on its head.

          • B0rax@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I‘m not sure about the $30. but look at the Fujitsu Futro S740. They can be had for about $50 with 8gb of ram and an included ssd, have support for dual 4K monitors and so on. No WiFi out of the box, but they do have a second m.2 that can be used with a cheap WiFi card if that is what you need (or you could install a second ssd).

      • Jode@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Is it possible to get these pi’s for that price now though? Because I member 2 years ago looking at paying rediculous scalper pricing for a pi to run octoprint on, and by the grace of my brother having a spare one was able to avoid spending 150 bucks on scalper bullshit.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yes, but it’s a hassle. I bought a 4gb from digikey a few weeks ago. They have a list of stock on their site, although it looks like they are currently out. They are a b2b seller, so you need to verify your identity to buy from them, but they will sell you 1 or 2 Raspi 5s directly.

          All that said, the article is about Raspi ramping up production. It will get easier to buy them soon.

        • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I unloaded my pi 4 on eBay those past summer because the prices were so high and got the thin client for cheaper. No regrets.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That’s a 2013 CPU. Pretty ancient, likely no modern codec hardware support. Also look like it hits a 208 on geekbench 5 single treaded, where a raspi 5 is getting 574. Multi treaded, you have the above at 708, versus the Raspi 5’s 1608.

          So just off the cuff on the cpu, the +$30 raspi5 has 3x single thread speed, and 2x multithread speed. The PI does even better on newer tests. That doesnt take into account the large improvements to RAM either that you get going from decade old ddr3 to ddr4, or wifi 5, or being able to add an nvme, etc. Looks to me that youre getting a lot more computer in a $60 raspi5 than this $30 sff.

          Im betting this $30 sff stacks up better against a $30 raspi 4, in which case, yeah, that tracks.

          • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s pretty rare to have high performance requirements in an embedded application. Many people load one project onto their pi and for most cases it’s overkill. If you need modern codecs, then buy a streaming box. If you want a nas, then buy a nas. You also need to factor in the additional ~$20-$30 of stuff that you need just to boot up a pi.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              So your argument is that a raspi 5 is too good of a machine for most use cases? That’s a wholley different argument than the “raspi 5 is too expensive for its specs.”

              I would argue that you can’t really speak to people’s individual computing needs without knowing what they are.

              Im personally using a 5 as a media box with libreelec, and after paying for everything, I’m out $90. That’s still $10 cheaper than a roku 4k ultra, and it does everything and much, much more without locking me into a ad-riddled ecosystem on static hardware. That’s a great value for money that the $30 SFF options can’t compete with.

    • moreeni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Such as? I’ve been looking to buy one recently. Are there any you could recommend for an amateur that wants to host totally random small services on a microcomputer?

      • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not the one you replied to, but I bought an Odroid when it was difficult to get a pi. I wouldn’t say it’s in the same category. It’s bigger, more expensive than normal pi prices and more powerful. It’s probably perfect for what you’re looking for. Where you might run into trouble is if you have very tight power consumption requirements or plan to use add on boards.

    • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What are some good other options? I haven’t kept up with the advances with this stuff in a few years.