• Atemu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Problem is that the average person cannot discern between an actual expert and a charlatan.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      And yet Linux works fine. Not everyone needs to be a dev, devs can tell the difference between an expert and a charlatan.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I meant that as a reply to the second paragraph which generalised anarchism; including the non-Linux world.
        I also disagree that this isn’t an issue in the broader Linux community however. See for example the loud minority with an irrational hate against quite obviously good software projects like systemd who got those ideas from charlatans or “experts”.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know, I used Linux as an example. Just like not everyone needs to be a weatherman to trust weatherman that can recognize experts among themselves, so too can engineers recognize experts among themselves, and so forth.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Skilled programmers can see that Linus is an expert. It works in tech. It probably works in any professional environment - anywhere where skilled people are picking someone highly skilled.

      For the average person, we have clearly seen average people suck at picking expert leaders, though it works fine in small groups

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. This is why the voice of the people should generally speaking be ignored. This is also why 90% of people should be ignored when deciding economic policies.