given the scrutiny around Tesla, it’s interesting this story doesn’t seem to have come out sooner since this is a fairly novel workplace accident

  • ryan@the.coolest.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 months ago

    Important context autotldr missed:

    The incident happened when the engineer was programming the software that controls the robots, which cut car parts from aluminium, The Information reported.

    Two of the robots were disabled, but a third was inadvertently left on. As it went through its normal motions, it caught the worker in its claws.

    Yikes, that should be checked multiple times before someone gets close to the clawed aluminum cutting robot. Failure of process, I suspect.

    • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lock out procedure wasn’t followed properly. You’re supposed to check that equipment is in a safe state before you go into a dangerous area like that.

      • mars296@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes but if for example management is pressuring employees to make repairs in X amount of time that causes them to have to rush, its the company’s fault. Similar to Norfolk Southern giving train engineers 45 seconds per train car to do safety inspections.

      • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        Almost one in 21 workers at Tesla’s Giga Texas factory was injured on the job in 2022, according to The Information, compared to the industry average of one in 30.

        It’s almost like they have some systemic issue with safety and procedures or something…

        • PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It could also be that they are better about reporting incidents than other employers. I’m also curious what they mean by “the industry” if they mean automotive manufacturers or manufacturing in general. I work at a plant that makes parts for heavy equipment, which is similar to automotive, but obviously not automotive. We’ve had 2 recordable incidents this year. One of which was due to someone not wearing their issued cut resistant gloves while handling metal scraps and then needing stitches. There wasn’t any reason for them not to wear their gloves except for laziness or complacency.

          • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Over here in Aus we like to have a “as few maiming’s as possible” policy. You say laziness and complacency, I call it a national disregard for worker safety, an underfunded & toothless OSHA and union-busting, all caused by unchecked capitalistic greed.

            But let’s get back to this particular incident. For a start, here’s an article from 2021 about a system to allow robotic arms (and others) to sense human presence and not cause injury to them. So what, Mr. Elon “Autopilot” Musk couldn’t have designed a similar system for his factory? Hah, no, he just doesn’t give a fuck. This article goes into it in more depth. The Fremont Tesla factory had an even higher 1 in 12 injury rate last year. Also, yeah nah, they failed to disclose dozens of injuries. And these two rates don’t account for them. Still don’t believe me? Here’s a paper comparing Tesla to the automotive industry average. It cites it’s source as the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

            But you should absolutely congratulate your colleagues. Assuming there’s more than 41 of them, you did better than Tesla! 👏

            CW: first four links contain fake gore

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Occupational hazard. Doesn’t mean said engineer isn’t owed compensation though. On the contrary.

    • nebirus@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      Considering the subject matter, perhaps the auto-TLDR bot has a conflict of interest!