I watch a fair amount of series, but I’m not a data hoarder. I see the value in 2GB episodes, but I watch most series on my laptop, my simple 1920x1080 tv or even my phone where that value doesn’t make a difference. If I want to have a theater experience, I’ll go to the theater.

Most of the times I just want to enjoy a good story and relax before I go to bed.

I don’t have infinite storage and I hate when I want to download something new, but Im out of storage, so I have to delete stuff first.

  • Marxine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreed, since I mostly watch stuff on my not-4K laptop or my not-4K phone.

    For people who like to watch stuff on huge 4K screens and stuff, they’ll require higher quality videos, but as long as everyone has their needs meet I’m more than fine.

  • seaturtle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I agree, I can understand wanting higher resolutions but there are diminishing returns and even 1 GB for a half-hour episode is pretty absurd.

    Plus, you can’t seed what you can’t keep.

  • BitterSweet@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The rise of HEVC and AV1 is arriving! Keeping the quality with a smaller file size. Plex and most android devices support AV1 now too!

  • Briongloid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    500mb 1080p HEVC for most shows on a 75" TV, but if it’s a space sci-fi show with lots of dark scenes I need that 1GB-2GB episode.

    Some shows get by on 200MB, but it depends how static the scenes are and how much lighting there is.

  • drunkensailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    couldn’t agree more. I watch pretty much everything on a 50" 720p TV from 10ish years ago. as long as its not some god awful 240p pixelated garbage, I’m fine. When I go over to some buddies places where they have newer nicer tvs and the qaulity is better, I still am 99% focused on story and idaf about the pockmarks on someones face etc.

    I don’t hate extra quality but end of the day, i want to prioritize disk space without having complete garbage on quality. love it when encoders can do stuff in x265 instead of x264 to cut off a few extra MB.

    i have a theory that when quality started going crazy (2K by my mark) is about the same time where story quality in tv shows started taking a big dive. Byt I’m sure lot of ppl not agree lol.

  • SmokeFree@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as you are happy with that, all good. Fuck the people that sets a standard for you.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    1337x has tons of episodes that are that size. It seems to either be ~200mb or 2gb+ though. It would be cool if there were a nice middle ground.

  • idle@158436977.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I download the biggest files i can get. Im going to delete it when I’m done with it anyways, who cares about the space.

  • richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not on my 65" 8k OLED they aren’t! You can absolutely tell the difference.

    Smaller/low res screens though, sure.

    • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I’m saying; not everyone watches media on their phones. I have a Plex server at home with a projector and a mediocre 5.1 (not a HTIB). No way I’m running anything less than 1080p.

      • richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ha, yeah. I work from home, and when I’m out the last thing I want to do is look at my phone.

        So I watch films at home. I paid for a high end home cinema set up, I’m gonna make the most of it. Otherwise it’s just a waste.

        This may change as I’m having to downscale a bit for my new apartment…but yeah, 200mb still won’t be enough.

  • DrMango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really shot myself in the foot downloading 4k60 versions of some of my favorite movies. The quality is great, but I can really only watch them on my gaming pc.

    • abbadon420@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but impractical with an unstable internet connection. Maybe i’ll look into it if I ever fix my wifi

  • arcrust@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your best bet would be to use handbrake and transcode them down yourself. I have a relatively. I’ve setup for my living room and thus want to get the best quality I can. Exact opposite reasons to you but, It’s easy to downgrade, basically impossible to upgrade.

    But that’s my two cents. Ideally, every file is uploaded with both of us in mind.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just going to say, handbrake is a good way to cut back a bit on file size if you get the settings right. It is very taxing on hardware tho.

  • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good enough for who? You? Sure. But not everyone watches on a small screen. Some people might actually care about the quality too. Some of us can’t goto the theatre.

    2GB isn’t large by any stretch. There are 720p versions of pretty much everything (at least that’s what I see on most Usenet Indexers). You could easily get a multiple terabyte external drive if your internal storage is full.

    • Chev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A family of 4 going to the theater is about 1TB of external SSD. Nowadays they are smaller than your regular phone.

    • ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah complaining about storage space in 2023 is a bit silly. You can go on eBay right now and get a used 4TB SATA drive for $25. Even cheaper if you get SAS drives, you just need a SAS expansion card which is also around $20 or so. 6TB SAS drives are going for $30.

      ISP data caps are a bigger enemy than raw storage capacity these days. It costs me $50/mo to remove my 1TB cap. Which means it is more expensive to download 6TB than it is to buy 6TB of physical storage. And even SSDs are dirt cheap now. Storage has never been cheaper.

        • ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am using unRAID so if one dies I can just replace it. About 4 years ago I bought a lot of fifteen 3TB SAS drives and I have had them running 24/7 since then. Funny enough not a single one has died. They all had around 5 years of power-on hours and now they are up to 9 and still going strong. Honestly I expected to lose at least one per year but they are surprisingly resilient.

        • ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The good ol’ United States. Most of the major ISPs have caps here and you do not really have multiple choices because they basically have monopolies in their respective areas.

          • Retiring@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I did not know that! I remember data caps being a thing here in the middle of Europe in the early 2000s. There haven’t been data caps for home internet connections for a long time.

    • Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d even say that going to the theater sucks balls. The picture and sound quality usually sucks compared to a high quality download on a 75" 4k TV. Even a high bit rate 1080p video looks better than the theater.