To me it looks ideal, I like the smooth lines instead of the jagged lines of the Rav4. Also it’s smaller which is nice for parking, and I don’t need a lot of cargo space, just enough to get some medium sized items in the back.

  • Far-Discount-6624@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It looks good and I’m sure it’s a good platform. But I think the interior is cheaply built and doesn’t come with good options. It’s hard to find A small suv that is nice, not a budget built vehicle.

    • w1823@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is true. What’s scary is that you could go Mazda with a similar budget and get a bit more mileage and better fit and finish.

  • UrbanJatt@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They must not be popular in my area because I have yet to see one on the roads. Other than that, the corolla interior is basic af.

  • Mr-PantsMan@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the style of the Rav 4, but it’s gotten too big for many customers…watching Doug Demuro on Youtube and he pointed out a 2000 4Runner is shorter than the current Rav 4.

    They could probably even do a smaller one than the Cross, but maybe North Americans just don’t like compacts.

  • Newprophet@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Get the hybrid and don’t pay over MSRP.

    Avoid the belt CVT, it’s just a fragile design no matter who builds it.

    • w1823@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What issues with reliability were you seeing/reading of? Toyota CVTs apparently have been pretty reliable.

      • Newprophet@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you seen the inside of a belt CVT? The design is inherently fragile.

        Toyota probably makes the best belt CVT. But why take even the smallest chance when the eCVT is absolutely bulletproof and more efficient?

          • adnanclyde@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just so you know, the eCVT in the hybrid models has nothing to do with normal CVTs.

            I really find it strange they gave it such a name, considering the reputation the CVT as a design has.

            eCVT is probably the most reliable “transmission” you can have in a car.

          • ThatManitobaGuy@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve been with Toyota for almost 2 decades. That only time I’ve changed a CVT was under warranty, it had a leak that Toyota hadn’t released the seal for at the time, so warranty had us replace an entire transmission instead of changing a seal.

          • Newprophet@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The hybrid gets you an extra 30ish horsepower and +10mpg. But AWD is standard whether or not you want it.

            The newer Toyota CVTs uses a conventional 1st gear, an advantage over any other brand.

            If you can find one hybrid is always the way to go.

        • SileAnimus@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The design is so fragile that it’s used in industrial equipment all the time. Stop being a fudd.

          • Newprophet@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are any of those industrial machines road worthy?

            Belt CVTs in automobiles from every brand are prone to failure.

            Toyota CVTs were so great that Toyota decided they needed to make a drastic change and add a 1st gear.

            All of this is pointless because the hybrid has a bulletproof eCVT transmission and is much more efficient. There is no reason to not get the hybrid.

  • ifukkedurbich@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I know is it’s about the same size as the Rav4 of 20 years ago. Rav4 got too big so they had to create a car to fill the void.

  • macktea@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like it, the hybrid version is something I would consider for my next car.

  • Organic-Ad9474@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally like the size because vehicles just keep getting larger and larger, but hate the name. I HATE it when companies create an SUV with a cars name/brand and then just add “cross” to it.

    Just call it something else.

  • LibertarianP@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would have taken a good look at one if it was in stock. But I bought a CX-30 instead. The CX-30 driving experience is so damn impressive compared to Toyotas.

    • LongApprehensive890@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had a CX-30 as a rental. How the hell do you get over the utter lack of power and slow transmission. I thought I was gonna die merging into the hwy.

      • LibertarianP@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just use the redline. The car likes to rev. The Toyotas that we love were putting 50+ hp less when they came out. Europeans prefer the 2.0 with like 130 hp. At least it’s not a CVT.

        The steering on Toyotas and Lexuses feel so numb now.

  • SileAnimus@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work on them and drove one (gas model) to training multiple times. They ride good, the M20A engine has good power while getting good gas mileage. Maintenance is very simple. You lose some rear leg room but get a lot more storage room and a much higher roof line.

    It’s a Corolla with a lift/body kit and more interior space with the capacity to tow a bit. I like them. If I had a choice between the Corolla and the Corolla Cross I’d go for the Cross every time.

  • eexxiitt@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Best car in its class. Best combination of size, utility, fuel economy (hybrid model), and reliability and resale value that money can buy.

    Cons are the overall roughness of the vehicle, but as strictly a point a to b appliance the hybrid model is unmatched.

  • lexxlr8@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Get the hybrid. Without it it’s slow as dogshit and the motor is loud. Otherwise my GF has the hybrid and it’s been great!