His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What if it’s purely a subject matter question? Surely you wouldn’t be OK with a wedding photographer being forced to stay around for some spicier honeymoon pictures if they didn’t want to photograph adult activity…

    They shouldn’t be blocked from being a photographer just because they’re unwilling to photograph ALL subjects. That’s fucking stupid.

    • GunValkyrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately this is a strawman argument. The subject in question is a wedding. It shouldn’t matter what sexuality or race the people are.

      There’s a difference between filming/photography of pornography vs a wedding. Don’t be disingenuous suggesting that the mere act of being gay equates the same to pornography.

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      photographer being forced to stay around for some spicier honeymoon pictures

      probably shouldn’t compare a gay wedding to being forced to take sexual photos