• sixCats@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seems kind of ideal though, computers provide a near constant load (relatively speaking) that combines very well with nuclear energy.

    Perhaps we should be asking why we haven’t already been doing this for the past decade?

    • Acters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because it costs less money to push the cost to for taxpayers to subsidize it than owning it

      Correction