• Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 hour ago

    This timing. Nvidia sacrificing Huang at the alter of capitalism (resigned to live out his life in unimaginable luxury) to distance themselves from the disastrous Trump administration they have been cozying up to for two years. “It wasn’t us, it was that Huang guy! Please do not impact our market cap.”

    • geneva_convenience@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Unless it’s little girls or he raped someone this really isn’t that big news. What’s this Bill Clinton morality suddenly popping up.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        Affairs are in the news all of the time. What’s up with you thinking this is some unusual thing? The morality never left.

        Shouldn’t you be moderating fifty empty subs, posting to yourself?

  • likebudda@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Lost his job, will lose his wife, and half of his wealth. Lucky for him half his wealth is still wealth. He won’t get the Chinese spy baddies anymore, he’ll have to make do with the regular billionaire groupies.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Lol these fools think they’re so special and can do whatever they want and fail at it so much, but still crazy rich.

    • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If there is a video of him removing his jacket it definitely needs to be turned in to a meme like the sunglasses ones

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m convicted this guy consulted with every AI over who would be okay to fuck at any given time.

    “Hey, Claude, should I have sex with this hot Chinese lady? (Uploads nude)”

    “Sex is a very entertaining and sane activity for most people when done responsibly. This particular picture you uploaded shows some healthy attributes that most men would define as attractive. If the occasion arises, go get her, tiger!”.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “Your absolutely right, having sex with a foreign spy was not the right call, I shouldnt have made it. Do you have any other sexual relations inquiries?”

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        “Actually, yes! Completely unrelated stuff, but this coworker, twenty years younger rally likes my leather jackets…”

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Just fuck an escort if you are so horny and an unfaithful piece of shit. Having an affair with an employee and a business partner is the dumbest thing you can do as a CEO.

    • BillionaireStew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Having an affair with an employee and a business partner is the dumbest thing you can do as a CEO.

      Correction: Doing so without a prenup is dumber.

    • The D Quuuuuill@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      so a thing to understand about weird rich guy sex stuff is that they find power dynamics sexually alluring. the fact that he had power over this employee surely factored into the desireability of the encounter

      • CoffeeGhost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I hate Elon as much as the next guy, but we don’t need to resort to using slurs to get our point across

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think it has a very legitimate use, when used as a describing word about actions, instead of a way to mock handicapped people. And I think it’s a shame to completely dismiss a word that has a very nice length and prononciation for saying things in anger. It could just as easily be co-opted to mean something different that doesn’t mock handicapped people. There’s just not a better fitting word for many situations, since “stupid” just doesn’t cut it.

          Basically, I find it okay to use it when refering to actions like “Elon has done some retarded shit”. In such a case it isn’t used to mock handicapped people, which is never okay no matter what word you use anyway.

          • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            While I generally agree with the sentiment, you’re overlooking the inherently social nature of language. At the moment, that is a word non grata. Give it a decade on the euphemism treadmill, and it will become mostly acceptable to use in the contexts you outlined.

            At the moment, I think you’re going to have a hard time using that word without offending someone outside of a musical composition situation. You’ll probably offend some folks using it in the context of musical composition too, but at least “retard” is the proper term for slowing the tempo in the middle of a composition.

            • MBech@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              36 minutes ago

              It seems to very much depend on where you are. I have yet to hear literally anyone irl complain about use of the word retarded, when refering to an action. Either way, the meaning of the word is only going to change when people actively use it. It’s not going to change if we decide to stick with the “bad” version of the meaning and making it taboo.

              • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 minutes ago

                I have. Not very often, but it has happened at some points.

                I think using retarded to mean stupid could be part of the problem, actually. Like your Elon example, tbh. The fact that it is being used in a way that refers to mental faculties could cause offense to people with delayed mental faculties. Using the word to mean “slowed”, in the original meaning, without referring to mental faculties, is probably more likely to rehabilitate the word apart from the use as a slur.

          • Amarlune@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Considering the disabled community has said Southpark handles how disabled people should be treated real well with Jimmy/Timmy, and Southpark uses the word retarded, I concur.

          • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            Without taking sides in this debate, let me just say that you’d have an easier time arguing that “slurs are sometimes okay to say” than trying to argue that “‘retard’ isn’t a slur”.

            It’s like, 100% a slur. You know how ethnic slurs are called ethnic slurs? That’s because there are non-ethnic kinds. Really curious what definition you use for slur that wouldn’t include “retard”. It’s an old-timey word used to describe a specific type of person, which is now largely considered offensive by that type of person, and has become used in a general sense as an insult…I mean, what box does it not check?

          • SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Seems like its regional. Some areas really hate it. Others its totally fine to use at work. Thanks to the internet, both can interact and think the other is odd.

          • T. Hex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Here’s a good test for whether it’s a slur. Would you say it in front of someone with Down’s Syndrome, or would you find another word?

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I think Lemmy is over sensitive about these things too. To me, retard is more like a funny word. But there are plenty of people who think it should never be used anymore because of actually retarded people and how they may feel.

            Also, the word is banned from YouTube I think, and possibly large parts of reddit as well. :) I think its silly but whatever, I can live with not using it, sure.

              • 1984@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I think banning words are funny. :) Can’t wait to see what’s next. Probably the word Muslim will insulting soon.

                • canofcam@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  It’s harder to understand why using a word would be wrong when they don’t affect you. Have some empathy and understand why for people that are marginalized and called something as a slur that it would be nicer to just stop using the word.

                  Nobody is banning the word, either. Just responding with their own free speech to say it’s idioitic to not understand why slurs are wrong to use.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You just know there’s a massive amount going on under the surface. There are going to be so many metoos who are voiceless in lower ranks being assaulted of this is just the surface we are seeing.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They were not assaulted, come on. :)

      Women like men with power and money. This is all voluntary from both sides.

      But yes, probably more ladies coming out soon.

  • ransomwarelettuce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 hours ago

    bit refreshing seeing a billionaire not fucking kids.

    a bit of a horndog and cheating bastard, but who expected a saint?! this guy is a CEO he would sell his soul for a increase in stock value.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’m not upset at all about the infidelity. But judging from this thread, I guess people care a lot about if he is faithful or not.

      I think it may be a lot of virtue signaling also, as usual. But it’s a fact that a lot of people are unfaithful.

      Perhaps marriage is not a great idea in general if a lot of people are not happy in it. Usually the decision to marry comes early in a relationship, within a few years. Then reality hits that its not as exciting as they thought after a few years, and perhaps the attraction dies.

      I think a lot of guys would cheat with a woman like this, and if they would, I dont think its authentic to judge Jensen for that part.

      • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In countries without state welfare, marriage is an economic construct to secure the funding of raising children. In the past it was also used to secure the funding of the potential mother.
        Marriage did already change a lot. But in the countries with shitty state support for single parents and their children, it still serves its purpose. It does not prevent cheating, though - and probably never did.

        You are right that the judgement is a bit stupid.
        A quarter of all men cheat. A fifth of all women cheat. Cheating is somewhat common. Maybe, it’s time to accept the fact that human sexuality isn’t really that easy to confine. Normalizing porn as venting mechanism for unfulfilled desires might help men and women stay exclusive.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s hard to know for sure how many cheat, and I suspect the real numbers are much higher than what the statistics say (since people won’t always be honest about what they do or did).

          I suspect people are afraid of getting caught, mostly, and I read that most cheating happens when being away on conferences and stuff like that. Whenever there is no chance that anyone else finds out who meets together in a room.

          But yeah, people won’t like to think about these things since it’s scary as hell if you are being cheated on.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Kids are not subordinates or chinese intelligence, so they wouldn’t even move the needle in ‘newsworthiness’ in this sad state of affairs.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Give it time, we’ve just started investigating.

      Fucking a spy who targeted him is a restraint problem. Fucking a second woman at work who wasn’t paid to seduce is a serious restraint problem.

      A serious restraining problem and unlimited privilege make for sketchy waters.

    • tio_bira@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      bit refreshing seeing a billionaire not fucking kids.

      So far… I convinced than 99,9% of the bilionaries have one of those secret places epstein style to do things who would make the the movie “Hostel” look like a pg13 shopping mall movie