• Matty Roses@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t know why after a decade of Trump people think “ummm akshually that’s illegal” means anything.

      They’re breaking the law. Openly. THEY ARE DABBING ON YOU.

      The question isn’t if they can legally - they cannot. Nor if they can - they are. It’s what are you going to do to stop them?

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        In the Untied States it’s illegal to depict a living person on a coin. Trump coins are a monument to the law not applying to him

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      24 hours ago

      As long as the DOJ is controlled by Trump they won’t charge him over anything no matter how blatantly he is rigging the election in his favor and how obvious it is that he should have lost.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Remember when Bill Clinton met Loretta Lynch on a tarmac and the Republicans completely lost their shit?

        A former president being seen speaking with the current Attorney General, and it was a massive fucking deal. Because they made it a massive deal, and Democrats allowed them to make it into a massive deal.

        Don’t ever let Republicans claim to care about this kind of shit.

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Don’t ever let Republicans claim to care about this kind of shit.

          It’s cute that you think you can stop Republicans from lying, or that they give a shit about hypocrisy.

          They don’t. That’s why they’re winning.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m saying that people need to stop giving them the benefit of the doubt. Especially Democrats who allow them to pull this shit over and over again.

            Edit: the media as well. Constantly sane-washing

            • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              By Democrats, you mean the elected officials in that party?

              They don’t give them the benefit of the doubt - they just don’t care about stopping them.

      • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yes but the Democrats will maybe come into power eventually and they’ll need something to pardon Trump over

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I had to look it up to see what Trump/DHS’s unconstitutional argument will be to ignore this. The “…” omitted sections show pretty clearly what they will say:

      Whoever, being an officer of the Army or Navy, or other person in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, orders, brings, keeps, or has under his authority or control any troops or armed men at any place where a general or special election is held, unless such force be necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both; and be disqualified from holding any office of honor, profit, or trust under the United States. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/592

      “…is held, unless such force is necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, shall be fined…”

      So their first-year-law-school failing DOJ leads will argue that they need ICE there to stop voter fraud, which force is necessary to “repel armed enemies of the United States” since hypothetically the rampant fraudsters could be armed.

      Either Trump will just do it without any lawsuit-ripening warning, or if his demented brain reveals his plans early and a suit is filed in time, the Supreme Court will hear the emergency appeal of the inevitable district and appellate findings that it is unconstitutional, and issue a shadow docket ruling that overturns the (ruling upholding the) Constitution without comment or reasoning.

      • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This was the entire point. Nullify the DOJ to create immunity, and disregard the law themselves. Then twist it and weaponize it towards the people opposing them.

        This is where we’re at. Remember when we were screaming about project 2025 and everyone was trying to tell us to calm down, saying “They’d never be able to do that?”

        Well, they did it.

        Fascists don’t seize power all at once. They test, backtrack and go two steps forward. They utilize the boiling frog effect.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        since hypothetically the rampant fraudsters could be armed.

        yes, we’ve already established that ICE/Trump brownshirts will be there.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Not sure if the supreme court will do anything. Already declined to intervene on the USPS issue, saying damage needs to be done first

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        They’re also not part of the military so I feel like this may not apply? I dunno I’m no legal expert.