• Bilb!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I see, well said. I’m not well informed on the absolute origin of the phrase. It wasn’t clear to me if the philosopher was responding to people saying that being intolerant of Nazis/other types of bigots in the pursuit of tolerance of diverse types of people was contradictory and therefore not morally or ethically sound, or just spontaneous hand-wringing.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not a direct response, but a response as part of a larger philosophical narrative.

      He was a true believer in a society driven by rational discussion and the free exchange of ideas, which was the main point of his work.
      As part of describing how he thought society should be run (tldr: we should discuss things, change institutions peacefully, and make small changes that we can actually tell if they worked instead of upending society in the name of an untested ideology) he spent some time describing the edge cases and weaknesses, which is where the quote comes from.

      He wrote the work during WW2 after fleeing Germany, so there’s more than a little implied context that people would have at the time of publication. Basically a general vibe of “what the fuck! Let’s not do that again!”