• TheMightyCat@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    without features that few people are going to use

    Every KDE user has shaken the mouse once just to see how big it gets, this is a critical feature!

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Doesn’t work for me in KDE anymore???

      Edit:
      It stopped working because I switched back to X11, it only works in Wayland, but I had to switch back, I think it was because some hot keys don’t work and can’t be configured under Wayland. Or at least couldn’t when I configured my system about a year ago.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If Gnome ran a restaurant, the waiter chooses the meal for you, and tut & shake their head if you try to deviate from it.
    If KDE ran a restaurant, if you shake the menu it’ll grow exponentially in size until it fills the restaurant.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      If Gnome ran a restaurant, the waiter chooses the meal for you, and tut & shake their head if you try to deviate from it.

      And if you want to add salt and pepper to your meal, there’s a convenient store across the street that sells salt and pepper shakers. No, the Gnome restaurant will not be providing them.

      • confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Are you implying GNOME is the ableist desktop environment? It might be even though it has lots of accessibility features.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Implication or not. GNOME is hit or miss with accessibility features. They’ve done some stuff, but they could still do more at no particular greater cost to them other than a shift in attitude. Which…you know… GNOME.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yes, and 99.9% of the meals you eat in your life will not be there. Because it is either prohibitively expensive and elitist gourmet BS. Or it is trivially easy to offer some choice when it is not elitist gourmet BS.

        • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Even at a more mundane restaurant, only having one meal for each course to worry about drastically simplifies life for the entire back line, plus it makes life easier for the chef or whoever does the ordering as well.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Even low fixed price day-menu restaurants in my town offer some basic choice or variation. People have food limitations and preferences.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              I’ve been to a restaurant in Korea where you pay per person and they just serve you one main dish (you have no choice) and like 8 unlimited side dishes

              It was about $5 and you had a choice of topping up or not. It was great, actually

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Cool, having choices is great, like you get to choose the side dishes and the toppings. That sounds awesome.

        • RQG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Which makes sense. If each day you offer one choice you can make that one really good.

          But for someone who doesn’t like that specific food it doesn’t work. They’d prefer having different options.

          Kind of similar with gnome and KDE.

          • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            The difference is, most people go to a restaurant to eat food, so the restaurant can get really good at making food that humans eat.

            People use a computer system to do all kinds of things. It is a lot harder to make one choice that will please everybody.

  • Err(()).unwrap()@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    GNOME’s design philosophy is “we’ve determined that nobody needs this feature”.

    KDE’s is “we’ve determined that nobody needs this feature… but it would be really cool, fuck it, we ball cube”.

  • McGuirk808@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t need this feature even a little bit.

    In lieu of this, I have consistently used this feature at least twice a week ever since I found it by accident. It adds a little joy to my day.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think it’s more “I found a thing that’s technically wrong and fixed it” and that shit pays dividends down the road when technology changes and people forget this was ever an issue. They solved it now so they don’t have to solve it later.

    • MML@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I feel like it could easily be explained in a tutorial or something I completely ignored, found out about it by sitting a mouse on corner of glass desk.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I have an old box running Gnome on Ubuntu. I did a massive update hoping they finally fixed some of my gripes with it.

    still no right click -> create text file in the file browser

    Welp, I’ll update again in two years

  • farvascw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    So even though I have been using KDE for months now, I had no idea that the cursor would continue to get bigger if you keep shaking it, thats amazing.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      The first patch of big cursor put a cap on the size as it was a bug for it to keep getting larger. But due to popular demand the cap was removed and set as a toggle.

      I love that the devs respond to feedback. Take notes gnome devs.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    gnome was horrible to use, even simplest things that make life easier were missing. fucking TRAY ICONS so you can more easily access some running programs?!

    made me feel like its system for bunch of elitist that can act snooty when scrubs like me cant handle their minimalist perfection.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Kde’s mouse growing big is actually useful though.

    Ever lose your mouse? Just a wiggle- which is an action I take anyway to find it- and it gets easier to find, for a moment.

    Lets me make the mouse tiny.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes, and the low-resolution pointer when you do this excessively is just unacceptable. I’m glad they’re finally addressing this pressing concern.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        The just added a high res image or whatever rather than scaling it up. Someone probably fixed it in their spare time.

          • programmerlexi@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Because it uses the XCursor format, which is a quite old standard. Getting apps to switch to a newer standard that has vector graphics is already hard enough. Getting them to do so without burning your GPU is basically impossible.