• EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    All they had to do was improve their facial recognition to scan all photos. Scammers would use fake photos and put their real photo (ai edited slightly) as the their last photo. This allowed them to get verified, but still scam. They don’t need more biometrics. Other apps are doing fine without your iris scans.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah but then they wouldn’t get to collect people’s biometric data to sell to the highest bidder.

    • Tiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      From what I’ve read, the “dating” meat market apps are doing horrible. I doubt they want to invest in a sinking ship, at least more than they have to.

  • D1re_W0lf@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Let’s partner with a bot maker to prevents bots. This is not about collecting and selling user data. No, not at all” 🙄😑

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh, people didn’t like the idea of giving their ID to third parties? Let’s move up to irreplaceable body parts. Next step: your fucking blood. Good luck declaring that one stolen when the database inevitably leaks.

    • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      That reminds me of my ex, she was willing to give her physical address and phone number to anyone who asked, but not her email address, because of security concerns.

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      It was a spam bot swarm a decade ago.

      I checked again around 2023, then it was full of human backed fake profiles that pushed cryptocoin scams. It’s called pig butchering.

      Today I assume it’s still pog butchering but backed by LLMs instead of people.

  • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Haven’t used Tinder in a few years, but I guess I won’t be using it in the future. I’m not scanning my eye to use what is arguably the worst dating app.

    • leoj@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      make the AIs better by scanning thousands of human eyes lol

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Could be unique like a fingerprint. Might be able to crosscheck this with other biometric data, like when a picture is taken at airports or border crossings.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Those fast track lines at the airport I recently read somewhere is supplied by a private entity, which means all those face scans are just added into a database for future surveillance.

        • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          You can say no to the face scan at those. The TSA agents don’t get paid enough to try to convince you otherwise and just say “okay.” The amount of people just willingly scanning their faces for whatever nefarious bullshit they want to scan faces for does not surprise me, but does cause me dismay

  • inari@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sure, let’s pretend they care about that issue. It’s not about collecting user data to re-sell later, oh no

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    AI is not doing this all on it’s own.

    Where there are fake profiles, there are also real human scammers owning them. And they won’t have no problem at all with buying enough real human data from somewhere.

    So if tinder wanted to do such a thing for serious, they wouldn’t choose such a stupid , short-sighted action.

  • PerfectDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Maybe it is finally time for open-source(ish) dating to make an impact!

    (It won’t. I tried it a couple years back and it is a ghost town!)

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s probably a Goldilocks zone thing where too few prevents it from working, and too many will inevitably be overrun by bots and scanners.

  • IratePirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    If this truly were about keeping bots off the platform, I’d predict a great improvement in how genAI renders human eyes. Either way: supposed problem not solved, but more sensitive data collected in the process. Task failed successfully.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    What stops a human running Tinder bot profiles from scanning their eyeball, getting the badge, and continuing on their merry way of running the bot?

  • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh I just watched a video on this the other day, apparently scammers (like the types who do romance scams, pretending to be a gorgeous guy, then taking all your money) are getting around this security function.

    They upload all stolen pics of a gorgeous guy (probably exists for women versions too) then there’s one picture of them, because they have to have one pic of themselves to get the verification tick. But that one pic is obscured, like a face on a billboard or add on a poster on a street. And then tinder verifies the whole account, regardless of the other pics. I forget, it’s either bumble or hinge, I think it was bumble, deletes all the pics that don’t look like you, after verification, so those were sites that block that scam.

    That’s an aside from ai profiles. There does need to be something to protect users from scammers. I couldn’t ever speak for what the best verification option is, myself.