• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I love this topic but I feel like no one has a realistic solution for how we’re going to manage huge ecosystems in a very labor intensive fashion. I don’t think it’s really possible in the current socioeconomic context.

    The natives did it by having the entire community involved. We may need to move towards something like that.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Generally, good land management is lazy land management. Nature (and her ecosystems) got on just fine without us. The only reason we need to manage the fire cycle now is so that we don’t have our population centers burnt by the natural fire cycle. However, we largely already fucked that part up by intervening in the fire cycle, and not allowing areas close to these centers to burn. As a result, you end up with conflagrations popping up where you don’t want them to.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly this. Most land management is focused on “how can we make this better for humans” not “how can we make this better for nature”. The answer largely is “stop fucking with shit and let it do its own thing and self regulate again”.

  • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It also works for zippos, chapstick, airpods, pocket watches, meshtastic nodes, hand warmers, dime bags and condoms!

    • Sunspear@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Airpods, for when you forget to take your jeans with you somewhere?

      Edit: man i’m dumb i thought it was about airtags