Probably because some trans women have beards and the kind of person who would think that trans inclusiveness is a special Lemmy thing is often also the kind of person who doesn’t bother to learn that sex, gender, and gender expression are different things and suspects that ignorance in jokes from a time where that ignorance was the norm to the point of being near-absolute is SUPER triggering to rational non-bigots? 🤷
Is the first one not offensive to the Lemmy community?
can you elaborate on why it may be?
Probably because some trans women have beards and the kind of person who would think that trans inclusiveness is a special Lemmy thing is often also the kind of person who doesn’t bother to learn that sex, gender, and gender expression are different things and suspects that ignorance in jokes from a time where that ignorance was the norm to the point of being near-absolute is SUPER triggering to rational non-bigots? 🤷
That run-on sentence hurts my brain while still explaining things. TIHI
Sorry, I was on my way to bed so didn’t give myself time to reformat it to something more reader-friendly
If sex and gender are two different things, can you define gender without referring to sex? Honest question
well written ☞ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex–gender_distinction
This article refers to sex throughout its entirety; the ask was for a definition of gender without reference to sex
I’m not very interested in these questions, but my understanding is that gender refers to a role in society, while sex is more qbout biology.
You should stick to designing coasts.
Unlike your award winning fjords, your sealioning is tiresome and unoriginal.
Sealioning? Apologies, but I don’t understand what you mean. May I trouble you to please elaborate?
Whether this was deliberate or not, it’s still pretty funny.
I take it back, if it wasn’t deliberate it would be especially funny.
Here you go
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Even if you ignore the whole beard aspect, the witness started their first sentence with He. That alone makes the next question redundant anyway