• Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    In Celsius it is chirps in 8 seconds + 5 (Dolbear’s Law), but if you listen a single “Chirpffffffsss”, than better stay at home

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I dunno, out of all the uses of metric system, Fahrenheit seems the more logical than the rest…

      Metric temperature as Celsius is just as random as any other made up system of temperature measurement. Fahrenheit used the temperature of the human body to create his system, which makes a lot more sense than other systems.

      I think our measurement of time for example is way more backwards than the fahrenheit system…

      Kilometers and centimeters and distance totally makes more sense in metric but I am an American (USA American) and inches and miles are easier for me because of it ngl

      • Iunnrais@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I agree with you, except that I think the time system is great. It was deliberately designed to be maximally divisible, and makes a lot of sense in that manner. 12 hours of daylight— a highly divisible number, with 60 small (minuscule, or “minute”) divisions of the hour, which is even MORE divisible than 12. Then when time keeping got more accurate, they added a second division of 60 more parts, and… well, called ‘em seconds.

        Basically, 12 and 60 are just so divisible they make really good bases.

      • MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Fahrenheit used the temperature of the human body to create his system, which makes a lot more sense than other systems.

        What is 0°F in terms of the human body? I’m guessing that 100°F is supposed to be a normal human body temperature, but in reality that will vary from person to person and everybody I’ve met is usually 97-99 unless they have a fever.
        In Celsius/Centigrade, 0° is the freezing point of water at 1 atmosphere of pressure, and 100° is the boiling point.
        In Kelvin, 0 is absolute zero, and it scales with Celsius/Centigrade because anchoring it to water just makes sense.

        Fahrenheit is fucking silly and people only defend it because it’s what they were familiar with growing up, so they teach the next generation the same thing, thus perpetuating the cycle of tradition for the sake of tradition.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          From Wikipedia: ——————— Several accounts of how he originally defined his scale exist, but the original paper suggests the lower defining point, 0 °F, was established as the freezing temperature of a solution of brine made from a mixture of water, ice, and ammonium chloride (a salt).[2][3] The other limit established was his best estimate of the average human body temperature, originally set at 90 °F, then 96 °F (about 2.6 °F less than the modern value due to a later redefinition of the scale).[2] ———-

          Any measurement of temperature is going to be relative to the atmospheric pressure among other variables… I’m not a scientist but Celsius is just as random… it may make more sense because freezing water and boiling water make sense to you with a refrigerator and stove… for most of human history this would not have made any sense……

          There’s uses of metric that make a lot more sense, it is not my intention to defend imperial systems of measurement or whatever they are called, it is interesting to me though….

          What are the measurements we can define where if we met a completely alien race from another solar system where we could immediately agree on the system… that’s probably the best one lol

          Kelvin does make sense with the absolute zero thing, in my opinion at least… now I need to look up if there is a maximum temperature. And whether it matters lol… matter would probably fall apart at that temperature in which case it doesn’t matter anyways haha (edit: I just learned that Kelvin uses the same scale as Celsius apparently)

          Get it? It wouldn’t matter 😂

          • Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            There is a theoretical max temperature, the Planck Temperature ≈ 1.416 x 10^42 K. It’s the temperature at which the wavelength of emitted light is the Planck length.

            Basically, a system at planck temperature probably would consist of many tiny black holes, and adding energy to said system would create a larger black hole, thereby lowering the temperature.

            • DancingBear@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Woooooah, man, but what if you put some weeeed in there man….

              I thought a Planck was a small measure of distance? So that’s space,

              I assume you have a idea what you know, space itself has energy?

              Also, wouldn’t the black holes just combine, I assume these black holes are far apart in space?

              I am not a physicist lol

              I thought a black hole was a whole lot of stuff so a small black hole sounds off the charts ugh now I have to pretend to be a scientist and and go back to my mit free lectures damn it

              Edit: In my imagination you’ve made me try to put a bunch of black holes kind of like dots on a black sheet of paper in the canvas of my imagination but if they were that close together they would just instantly combine or explode or something, the space between the dots would have to be some inconceivable distance for the “small” black holes to not combine and explode or gravitate the waves or whatever they do when they do that.

              Or maybe it’s some perfect system where the small black holes are gravitating orbiting each other because we are talking about the maximum conceivable temperature so kind of like Led Zeppelin Pink Floyd or Bob Marley or something

              Way cool, thank you :

              • Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                The idea is that the tiny black holes are planck scale and they evaporate before they get anywhere near each other. Picture this:

                It takes 10^20 Planck lengths to equal the diameter of a proton. It takes 10^20 protons to equal the diameter of the earth. And it takes 10^20 earths to equal the diameter of the observable universe.

  • arnitbier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I dont like this nonsense. They never tell you what constitutes a chirp, is it chirp chirp? Is it each chirp cause that means its 140°. Like have you ever tried to actually use this in RL? It simply doesn’t work.

    Its for a very specific region and a very particular cricket. So its bullshit to pass it off like some natural law

    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You’re telling me you cant keep track of 30-45 simple chirps off a standard reference cricket in a 15 second period? Did you even go to school dude?

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You’re telling me you cant keep track of 30-45 simple chirps off a standard reference cricket in a 15 second period?

        That depends on whether it’s a frictionless sphere.

        • And009@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          What about vector forces, like the wind, gravity. Not even getting into humidity and ability to hear specific sound frequencies.

          And then we have to deal with… Math.

      • arnitbier@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Well there is no standard, most crickets chirp different and at different speeds its not working in most places, so it narrows the observation not study really down to next to useless and an occasional huh look correlation, youre just the guy that believed it without thought and hasn’t traveled at ALL, or applied themselves to thinking outside their dogmatic-ass-box apparently.

          • arnitbier@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 minute ago

            Thou put in the standard reference cricket part, used to say just a standard cricket so edited to make yourself loo less stupid, fucking loser

            Edit: and a whole day later. Really, pathetic, maybe you should get a life 🤔

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          No, they all chirp together, that’s kind of why they do it, maybe there are other insects chirping if you are in a more rural area like locusts or something that chirp really fast?

          • arnitbier@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Use your goddamn brain, i literally said its a drone not individual chirping and its useless to use to gauge in most places without the specific “temperature cricket” its a drone of insects chirping there is no fucking obvious line for a chirp in a second, you have to capture one and even then its plain not how the chirping works

            Literally listening to them now just nonstop chirp drone. That’s how most are. Read the fucking manual. Aka the study and what it says stop dramaing it up like a little bitch and pretending your being smart or anything other then the bitch you are being

            Its literally no breaks for almost all regular crickets species except in specific regions in specifically north america which is what the study was saying.

            Chirp chirp, chirp chirp is a fucking myth you made up in your heads to sounds like your not dumbasses in a tiny online space 😎👍

            *scientifically known as Oecanthus fultoni. This species is often referred to as the “thermometer cricket” due to its reliable chirping behavior in relation to temperature.

            No others. Just that one you small, yet sufficiently dumb, asses. 😥😥😭😭

            • DancingBear@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              Ok, perhaps you are hearing a cacophony of other insects, or your hearing is different than mine.

              Yes, I am a bitch but that is neither here nor there, but I can clearly hear a wave pattern with the chirps as I sit outside on my front porch, and I already knew about this cool way to measure the temperature in Fahrenheit… (I didn’t remember the number you had to add) ……obviously, we already know whether we are too hot or too cold without knowing the exact temperature though… it’s just a fun factoid when you’re camping

              Also if you make a loud bang or a loud noise you can interrupt the chirping but they will continue… I don’t really know if grasshoppers have ears though, would be pretty dumb if they didn’t considering all the chirping they do

              I believe I read or saw in a nature program though that they all chirp together like that to help deter predators from finding any one chirper…

              • arnitbier@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                So you can’t do it then and your just bullshitting to engage and pretending that’s not it for the sake of drams? I feel you could be more… satisfied doing something else. But you have some niceness and I don’t want to fuck your day up but this seems… Unproductive and only helpful to the one side from my point of view.

                Good luck tho you seem alright in a way thats difficult

                still this is discussion is retarded as the study has not been read by those that disagree. And are referencing the study for supporting evidence. That literally undermines what they are claiming and supporting my original statement so fuck off with that please

                If there’s necessary drama that’s fine but this isn’t that for me 👍👍

                • DancingBear@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  Not sure what you’re saying? You seem upset about life or something,

                  Are you having a bad day? feel free to vent…

                  Very strange lol why are you messaging me about Celsius?

                  Celsius will never win!

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Counting the negative chirps is the worst. Like, why is there a -20ch marker if it’s never -20?

    • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It must be in that small part of the world where temperature is measured in Fahrenheit. Eurasian, African, Australian or even South American crickets would never do that.

      • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        18 hours ago

        No mate look on the right side, the number 20 is repeated. Ye imperial units are fucked but we are not at a point where 20 Celsius is equal to 2 different Fahrenheit values.

        • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          look on the right side

          Thanks! I looked at the wrong side at first

          No, I was just kidding, including the first comment. Both sides are messed up, it was a variation of the “anything but metric” meme.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I was trying to think of any situation where this would be useful and the only thing I come up with is a way to keep kids occupied during a camping trip.

  • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Yeah, I’m going to hunt one down, and isolate it from all the others just so I can count its chirps so the count won’t be screwed up by being confused by other chirpers - all to avoid simply looking at all the other sources of said information that are much more readily available and convenient

    Unless you’re doing some sort of environmental science experiment while living in a post-apocalyptic world where every pre-existing analog thermometer device for accomplishing this has somehow been destroyed, this is utterly useless.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Only in the sense that knowing the exact temperature on an arbitrary scale is utterly useless. Even Celsius scale is arbitrary, I guess it does use one molecule at an arbitrary atmospheric pressure as a loose guide though…

      Is it always 100 degrees Celsius in a vacuum? Because water boils in a vacuum.