• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    Bluetooth alternatives are far better these days

    Disputable.

    • they are cable-less, thus need to be charged separately
    • they are cable-less, thus it is easier to lose them
    • bluetooth implementation is a potential security vulnerability
    • transmission by radio will always be less energy efficient than transmission by wire
      • tomiant@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I liked being able to accidentally brush up against my headphones or putting them down for a moment without them turning off my music.

    • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      i’m a musician, have a trained ear and even with mild tinnitus have yet to see any BT audio transmission that matches the fidelity of cables.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        That aspect did pop into my head but I am not qualified to comment as I never use any wireless headsets, nor are my ears trained enough for fully appreciating hi-fi quality.

    • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 days ago

      BT 6.1 introduced Randomized RPA (Resolvable Private Address) which should help with some of the security issues. That said I wouldn’t expect to see headphones implementing 6.1 for quite some time. It just came out in May.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I have two devices, one is my phone, and one only plays music. I only ever use my phone as my phone, and my music device as my music device in my car, and both run over Bluetooth.

      It is a crapshoot as to which role my car will assign to which device. Sometimes I have to put my phone in airplane mode so that the car won’t try to assign it the media player role in Bluetooth settings. I’m not impressed.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 days ago

        check the Bluetooth settings on your phone. on mine, I can disallow roles that a peripheral could get, like media audio, phone calls, etc

      • Patches@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        That has a lot more to do with the car itself.

        If you ever want to talk about a shit OS…

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      they are cable-less, thus need to be charged separately

      Not a major drawback, IMO.

      they are cable-less, thus it is easier to lose them

      True, but I haven’t lost any in the something like 6 years I’ve been using them.

      bluetooth implementation is a potential security vulnerability

      What’s your threat model? Who’s going to be attacking your security via your headphones? What happens if they succeed?

      IMO this is a pretty ridiculous drawback, it’s like saying “wired headphones are worse because the wire can be used as a garrote”, which is true, but not an actual drawback for 99.999% of people.

      transmission by radio will always be less energy efficient than transmission by wire

      So what?

      IMO the drawbacks of wired headphones are:

      • The cable often gets tangled, and it’s a pain in the ass to untangle it
      • The cable can often get snagged on things, and if that happens the best thing that can happen is that the headphones can go flying out of your ears. The worst thing that can happen is that the phone goes flying out of your pocket and smashes on the ground.
      • The cables can get dirty and frayed, and if they get too frayed they can break or get worn down so they have an iffy connection.
      • Even when the cable isn’t tangled, just arranging the wire so it’s out of the way, long enough to get to your ears, but not so long it gets tangled can be frustrating.
      • Trying to use your phone for anything else while your headphones are attached can be a problem. Say you want to take a picture of something, or pay for something using NFC, you have to be careful of the cable. If you had the cable tucked into your shirt or zipped up in your jacket so it’s out of the way, now the cable might not be long enough anymore.
      • Because of the wire, you’re limited in where you can put your phone, and your head has to always be within a short distance to your phone. With a wireless headset you can choose to put the phone in a knapsack if that’s more convenient, and when you put down the knapsack you can take a few steps away from it without losing your connection and interrupting whatever you’re listening to.
      • If you’re doing something like working in the kitchen while listening to music or a podcast, you can’t put your phone down on the counter and use it to look at a recipe, because as soon as you have to move to go get another ingredient, or to move from the cutting board to the sink, you have to pick the phone up again. And that can be a real issue if you have goop on your hands and you’re moving to the sink to wash them off.
      • In cold weather / winter you might want to have your phone in a jacket or something. If you go inside and take the jacket off you either have to pause things while you transfer the phone to another pocket and rearrange the wire, or you have to do this complicated dance where you clear the wire and move the phone without accidentally yanking the wire out of the phone or out of your ears. With a wireless headset you just take the phone and move it to a new pocket whenever that’s convenient.
      • The headphone wire is a potential personal security vulnerability as a ninja can use it to garrote you.

      The drawbacks for a wireless headset are:

      • They tend to have batteries that can’t be replaced, so eventually they lose their ability to hold a charge and need to be replaced. It can get really annoying to use them when the batteries are starting to fail and they hold less than an hour of charge.
      • They tend to be much more expensive than wired headphones.
      • Wireless buds are easier to lose, and easier to drop. If you drop them they can bounce and roll under things, or into the street or who knows where.
      • They do eventually run out of charge, and you do have to charge them, and sometimes they can be low on charge / out of charge when you want to use them.
      • There’s a fair amount of lag, which can be annoying when you’re trying to skip commercials on podcasts and so-on.
    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      14 days ago
      • they are cable-less, thus need to be charged separately

      I’ll give you that, but my bone conduction headset lasts a few days with the amount I use

      • they are cable-less, thus it is easier to lose them

      Meh. I’ve put corded earbuds in my pocket and probably worn them out faster that way. Bluetooth headsets I tend to leave on (much to my wife’s annoyance) and that makes them last longer in my experience.

      • bluetooth implementation is a potential security vulnerability

      Aha, that van outside must be tapping into me listening to The Dandy Warhols! I knew it! (In all seriousness, if security is that critical you probably shouldn’t be doing whatever it is over WiFi, which is pretty much unavoidable with a phone)

      • transmission by radio will always be less energy efficient than transmission by wire

      Are we really talking about saving energy here? That’s like… Moisture in the bucket levels. Not even a drop in the bucket

      • Wildmimic@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I agree with you, even if you are downvoted. I’ve wrecked more in-ear buds by (non-replaceable) broken cable than i can count, while i’m on my 3rd bluetooth headphone in about 10 years - i lost none of them, and the second one is still around as backup.

        The security is a thing that can be patched if it pops up and is only an issue if your OPSEC differs strongly from the common citizen, and the energy argument comes across like a purity test - the light in my fridge probably uses more energy.

        I would never go back to cable, especially since noise cancelling doesn’t work without a battery anyway - and i am very unhappy without noise cancelling.

        Also, i have a power bank where i can use 21600 Li-ion Battery cells as power source (and it doubles as charger for those cells) - on travels i take a few batteries with me, and even if i find myself for weeks without power, i will have it whenever i need it.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      they are cable-less, thus need to be charged separatel

      If you wish for ANC you’ll need a battery anyway, and most people do want ANC these days

      they are cable-less, thus it is easier to lose them

      I’m loosing my wired headphone far more often, for a simple reason: wireless ones having a battery allows me to make them beep, given they are near, of course.

      bluetooth implementation is a potential security vulnerability

      Sure, and so are wired headphone as they act as an antenna, broadcasting to anyone with an appropriate receptor anything you say and/or hear.
      As for the implementation vulnerabilities, at least it can be patched.

      transmission by radio will always be less energy efficient than transmission by wire

      Sure, but is it that much of a problem? It would take years (if not decades) of constant listening to even use a dollar of electricity for wireless headphones. Even if you factor the data transmission from the phone into that.
      And wired headphone are not energy neutral either. They works by pulling energy from the phone battery.

      I prefer the wireless headphones ease of use to headphone I have to untangle every time I want to use them. I keep my wired ones for home uses.

      • wildone@rekabu.ru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        You can have both or you can deny people who like wired. You are choosing denial.

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          14 days ago

          Those who like wired aren’t out of option either. Adapters exists, are cheap, and have often a far better audio quality than integrated ports due to not being as size constrained as the main body itself, and being further from interferences. You can quite easily find some that allows to charge your phone at the same time (even if the usb-c norm do not allows it on paper).