With the 2024 presidential race beginning to unfold, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont said he believes that President Joe Biden will again earn the Democratic nomination — and the president likely win reelection if he runs on a strong progressive campaign.

“I think at this moment … we have got to bring the progressive community together to say, you know what, we’re going to fight for a progressive agenda but we cannot have four more years of Donald Trump in the White House,” Sanders said Sunday on “Face the Nation.”

Sanders endorsed Mr. Biden in April. Sanders referenced several of those issues in underscoring what he believes is the importance of building “a strong progressive agenda” to win the presidency in 2024.

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The infra bill was a huge shot in the arm and, based on the ads I’m seeing, he’s going to run on its passing… that bill is beyond amazing, but they should have gone harder. While the ~$1.6 trillion is an eye watering amount of money, ~$4-6 trillion is what was originally asked for and what is needed. Hopefully he’ll run on a Build Back Better: Part Deux. Also his appointees to the NLRB have been super progressive and aggressive, the return to Joy Silk will give the reinvigorated labor movement serious steam, but he also busted the RR workers ability to strike and he seriously shouldn’t have done that. Overall, I’m not mad at the Biden WH on domestic issues… but more is needed and he should have let the RR workers strike. Like, the economy be damned, call the hedge fund’s bet and end the Reagan era union busting.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      they should have gone harder

      “They” didn’t have control of Congress. Two Senators are Democrats but are much more centrist and won’t vote for certain things.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As well as mandated increasing federal fossil fuel extraction leases many times over before beginning any expansion of renewable energy.

        It’s amazing how neoliberals will just blindly believe the propaganda of Politico, NYT and WaPo 🤦

        • Alex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would you rather be dependent on foreign supply while waiting for renewable energy to be built? A lot of america still runs on oil and it’s gonna take a long time for that change even with the green transition finally happening.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fun fact: the US already produces much more oil than it uses and exports most of it.

            The “energy independency needs oil” argument is a false one made up by the fossil fuel industry and the corrupt politicians they own.

            Their efforts, not a lack of feasibility, are the main impediments to transitioning to a renewable energy grid, which can be done surprisingly fast (a 50MW wind farm can be operational in 6 months, a 10MW one in only 2, and a solar farm in 6-12) and the resulting decentralised grid would be much more resilient in avoiding catastrophic failure than one focused on a few large fossil fuel burning plants that stop working every time it gets too hot or too cold.

            In conclusion: your pro-fossil fuel argument is invalid and you’ve fallen for empty propaganda.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As an actual climate lobbyist, the IRA is the single most effective piece of climate legislation ever passed.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lobbying for WHICH climate action group, though? Some are as good for climate action as Neera Tanden’s CAP is for progress.

            In fact, you’re sounding like a more polite version of her right now with your exceedingly vague yet utterly false trumpeting of neoliberal saviours 🙄

                  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Nope, that’s not at all what I was saying.

                    I was pointing out that not all climate lobbyists know any more about climate policy and the content of specific bills than reasonably diligent laypeople.

                    As such, “as a climate lobbyist”, does not necessarily lend the authority to the following statement that some might imagine.

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They seem to be able to detect foreign propaganda and are immune to it, and deny US propaganda exists, despite living in the propagandized country on earth

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And even then, they’re much better than Republicans who can’t detect and are extremely susceptible to foreign propaganda.

            Of course, “much better than Republicans at resisting propaganda” is like “much better at bowling than an armadillo”. The species just isn’t built for it 🤷