• PNW clouds@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If you are safe from the prisoners and guards, get clean accommodations, are well fed, get outside/gym time for fitness, medical care, time to learn a vocation or study, occasional entertainment time (tv or whatever)… the only thing missing is a romantic partner… honestly, it sounds as good as an all inclusive retreat/vacation.

    I imagine not having control over your own life for years at a time would wear one down. But months? If I knew my outside people weren’t suffering because of my actions, it sounds kind of nice.

    But I’m an introvert that works from home, so, I’d miss my pets.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      the only thing missing is a romantic partner…

      That’s a rather glaring flaw. I mean, there’s an alternative in prisons or so they say, but only applies to a subset of people if voluntary.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The thing is, any country that takes care of their prisoners this well also takes care of their own homeless population. If Norway treats its prisoners this well, imagine what their homeless shelters are like.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Dude, it is still a prison. Saying ‘yeah I could use a highly regimented living space for a while’ is one thing. But a prison is still something else.

      Workhouses in Victorian England were very harsh places, sometimes even harsher than the prisons of the time… but they were not prisons. If a workhouse inmate wanted to leave, they could up and go at any moment without anyone stopping them. Because it was not a prison.

      • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The difference is that your example is designed to exploit you and, generally, your freedom amounts to “leave and get exploited elsewhere.” This is the same for poverty. Sure, technically you could walk away… But to do what? Suffer elsewhere in poverty?

        Those in Swedish prisons aren’t free to leave, but that’s not the only kind of freedom that exists. Freedom from starvation, danger, from the influences that lead to the crime that put you in prison. Is it really so hard to imagine a world where you might give up some freedom for real, tangible safety and peace of mind?