Summary
Sen. John Fetterman faced backlash from progressives after his first post on Truth Social calling the hush-money case against Trump “bullshit” and suggested pardons for both Trump and Hunter Biden.
Fetterman reiterated his stance from recent interviews, arguing such cases erode public trust in institutions.
The response has been divisive, with Trump supporters and progressives both criticizing him.
Fetterman’s broader shifts, including support for Israel and mocking climate activists, have alienated some Democratic supporters while gaining him favor among conservatives.
awesome sources! looks to me like exactly what you wrote: a massacre, huge but not labeled a genocide by any reputable source, and a zionist who wishes modern zionism was a theocracy but has written, admitting in print, that it wasn’t.
nah i don’t care go read them yourself
thanks for the opportunity to let me clarify. a few tips for an up and coming history scholar as yourself: it helps if you read the things you cite, and you might want to brush up on the accepted definition of genocide. 😊
At least my sources dont undercut my entire point like yours did.
240,000 civilians killed simply for their ethnicity by terrorist means is genocide whether you like it or not. I dont need an author to call it out for it to be true. Thats not how the world works, friend.
Its clearly not that you dont care, because you are the one who brought up the mods and how they should come and look at my comments. Its that you utterly failed and lack the common sense and basic dignity to take the loss, thank me for the sharing of data, and walk away like a well-raised human being.
Zionists are zealots and they are religious fundamentalists terrorists. It has been proven. You have yourself a nice day now. I’ll be blocking you now so we dont have to have a repeat of this behavior on your part.