Kremlin says hypersonic missile strike on Ukraine was a warning to the west

The Kremlin said on Friday that a strike on Ukraine using a newly developed hypersonic ballistic missile was designed to warn the west that Moscow will respond to moves by the US and the UK to let Kyiv strike Russia with their missiles.

According to Agence France-Presse (AFP), the Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, was speaking a day after Russian president, Vladimir Putin, said Moscow had fired the new missile – the Oreshnik or ‘hazel tree’- at a Ukrainian military facility.

Peskov said Russia had not been obliged to warn the US about the strike, but had informed the US 30 minutes before the launch anyway. Putin remained open to dialogue, Peskov said.

        • nick@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I suppose it’s also NATOs fault Russia invaded Ukraine in the first place?

          • Gucci_Minh [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            39
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes lmao, if they didn’t ignore the minsk agreements and do a coup (maidan) to install a CIA handpicked government, this would not have happened.

          • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            Pretty much, yes. If one great power keeps threatening and encroaching on another and undermines all attempts at diplomacy, it’s pretty obvious what is going to happen.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            46
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Yes, as many western experts explained in great detail for many decades now. Yet, we still have ignoramuses running around pretending that’s not the case. Even Stoltenberg has admitted this on record at this point, time to update your script

            He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all Allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe, we should remove NATO from that part of our Alliance, introducing some kind of B, or second class membership. We rejected that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO, close to his borders.

            https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_218172.htm

            • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              “We didn’t accept his demands for how we protect member states so he went to war” isn’t the defense you seem to think it is

                • Lupus@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  From:

                  Last I checked it was NATO that started launching missiles into Russia escalating the conflict, but do go on champ.

                  To:

                  One problem being that Ukraine isn’t a member state. 🤡

                  So which one is it?

                  Would you also say that North Korea is attacking Ukraine since it’s North Korean artillery shells being lobbed into Ukraine?

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    14
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    What’s the contradiction there? NATO wasn’t directly involved in the war in Ukraine, now it is. What part of that are you struggling to understand?

                    Meanwhile, zero actual evidence for DPRK attacking Ukraine, but I guess that’s not going to stop western intellectuals from talking about it.

          • IWantToMakeProgress [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Why is Ukraine the West’s Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer - Date: Sep 26, 2015

            John J. Mearsheimer, the R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor in Political Science and Co-director of the Program on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago, assesses the causes of the present Ukraine crisis, the best way to end it, and its consequences for all of the main actors. A key assumption is that in order to come up with the optimum plan for ending the crisis, it is essential to know what caused the crisis. Regarding the all-important question of causes, the key issue is whether Russia or the West bears primary responsibility.

            Watch this and think for yourself. A very similar comparison is Cuban Missile Crisis 1962.

        • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Any time you end a thought with “so therefore threatening nuclear holocaust is justified” you’re the bad guys.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            America, the only country ever to drop nukes on two cities full of people as a terror tactic, has a nuclear first strike policy and is therefore threatening the entire world with nuclear holocaust at all times. I agree, we’re the bad guys.

          • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            During WWII, America shocked the world when they revealed their nuclear capacity by dropping not one, but two atomic bombs on strictly civilian targets. Since then, they have maintained a first strike policy, meaning, their plans for their nuclear arsenal are not defensive, but aggressive and the highest form of escalation.

            During the Korean War, Dugless MacArthur asked the joint chiefs of staff for approval to use nuclear weapons on China, to the tune of 30, to 50 nuclear strikes. They approved. MacArthur’s goal was to create a radioactive no-mans land across Russia and China to act as a buffer zone between after the war was “won”.

            During the JFK Administration, they drew up plans for nuclear first strike against the Soviet Union if conflict in Berlin turned violent.

            The Nixon administration drew up plans to drop nuclear bombs on North Vietnam.

            Just this week, news broke that the Biden administration is considering giving Ukraine nukes. “Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union.” You’ll tell me this is strictly defensive, then I beg you to consider reading why the Soviet Union was giving Cuba nuclear weapons during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

            The only place threatening a Nuclear Holocaust is the United States. They remain today the only country on earth to have dropped not one, but two atomic bombs on war targets (read civilian populations).

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            1 month ago

            The fact that you don’t understand how idiotic that statement is says volumes about you. Imagine for a second what would happened if Russia started lobbing missiles into Florida from Cuba. Oh wait, we don’t have to imagine we know exactly what would happen. Killer clowns like you are gonna be the reason our civilization ends.

              • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                Español
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                The USA literally has a torture camp in Cuba with admittedly innocent people being held for life.

                I swear to god Americans know more about the Marvel movies than about their fucking state.

                • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  apologies for not exactly spelling it out for you - is the US actively bombing innocent cubans? I get it, there’s a torture camp- wish it didn’t exist. analogies don’t have to be perfect.

                  • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    Español
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    You’re literally the one nitpicking the analogy lmao.

                    Anyway, keep up the cope, gringo. Enjoy your cost of living crisis while yall froth at the mouth about Raytheon-appointed scapegoat.

            • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Nah the end of our civilization will be the dogs that roll over to daddy Putin like you.

    • pftbest@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is no threat at all, russia is just trying to bluff a stronger position ahead of inevitable negotiation rounds. To claim more benefits and more territory. They won’t be doing anything against the US no matter what. Maximum cut some underwater cables and tell more nuclear threats like they always do.