I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil. How can they win back the country? Is it too late?

  • figjam@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    Win it back from who?

    Other Americans who made this choice know who Trump is and thats what they want.

    The Rich have always owned this country. No one is taking anything from them. Its illegal to try.

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    Regardless of your views on the Orange Grifter / Gift from God (delete as applicable) this question is fundamentally flawed. “How do we build bridges, find common ground and begin to win over our fellow US citizens who have, in my opinion, made a poor and misinformed political choice that could have terrible consequences for them, our country and the world at large?” might be a more appropriate opener. I understand you’re upset, scared, desolate etc but your language comes off as belligerent and aggressive. Perhaps soften your tone and be more receptive to others’ concerns. For the record, I’ve got no flies on this turd as I’m not from the US, nor do I live there. Good luck.

    • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      The Republicans are running on a platform of attacking the rights of racial minorities, and the right for trans people to exist

      And the people who vote for them like the pain they cause or are so checked out they don’t know/care

      Idk if there is a way to work with people who’s political agenda is to kill you

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        If over half of your active voters want to kill people as part of a national policy then you’re probably fucked beyond repair as a people and a nation. My condolences.

  • jaxxed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think that first you have to start by admitting two things:

    1. Americans did win their/your election
    2. Americans have l9st faith in their democratic institutions

    After that, you can look at why the Democratic parties fail to appeal to Americans, and try to reform them.

    If you go outside of democracy to gain democracy, then you probably lose what’s left of your democracy.

    • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      Dam it must have taken you a while to come up with that one.

      That little squirt of dopamine you get when you’re malicious, you know the one you chase like a drug addict? It’s unhealthy and creates a worse world for everyone to live in.

      Stop being a malicious drug addict

  • MadBabs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    We radicalize, organize, pour into our communities, support one another, find people already doing the work and join in, and keep fighting like hell.

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    What do you mean? Trump won decisively. Electoral, popular, in the senate, etc…

    You’re really asking, “how does a minority continue to exist in the face of a fascist majority?”

    The answer is, generally, they don’t.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I think that is an oversimplification. He won the popular vote, but that’s the majority of voters, not the majority of people, right? So we cannot accurately say that the majority is fascist. We can only say that the voting majority is fascist.

      And then we need to look at who was conned, and how. Of course people who got conned need to work harder to avoid that in the future. We all agree on that. At the same time, the con artists and the people who enable the con, we also need to identify them and figure out what’s making them successful. If we talk about major newspapers and TV networks failing to cover how bad Trump actually was, or putting Harris on unrealistic pedestal, newspaper owners refusing to allow newspaper editors to endorse a candidate, the way Fox News preys on people who grew up trusting TV news and now have only watched Fox for the last two decades, open lies about who’s eating cats and dogs, a DNC that pushes centrist candidates even after 2016 when the weakness was exposed, and it’s clear that many left-wing voters are wildly unhappy, those are all things that smaller groups have done to help create the situation that we saw yesterday. And that’s just a short list.

      So what I hope we can do, is I hope we can avoid saying something trite like, this is what the American people wanted, full stop. If you want to make that a conversation starter, go for it. But it shouldn’t be a dismissive conversation ender, because it ignores what actually happened and What will continue to happen in the future.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        He won the popular vote, but that’s the majority of voters, not the majority of people, right?

        Right, the rest are just so lazy and consumed by apathy that they could not be bothered to vote when THESE were the stakes. I think we can confidently rule them out for any advocacy for our freedom.

  • scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So the way it looks now, Trump has won the presidency, and his allies will have the senate and house of representatives, and they already had the supreme court. The three branches of government will not be working as checks on each other’s power, unless we get very lucky and the various factions that make up the GOP split. This is obviously very, very bad, but there are still some checks on presidential power.

    1. Trump’s last term was a clusterfuck. Things may just be so disorganized that he struggles to actually get what he wants done.

    2. The states have limited power to defy the feds. While case law does state that federal law supercedes state law, that doesn’t mean all States will immediately cooperate wholeheartedly. Obviously a court battle will eventually get to the supreme court, but that takes time and requires a single panel of judges to beat multiple states into line on each new policy.

    3. Governments do have a small amount of caution when it comes to their people. One thing the crazy conservatives had right this whole time was that fundamentally, nobody was ever going to come for their guns because nobody wants to force a confrontation with a bunch of armed lunatics. In the same way, they’ll probably try to avoid massive riots and general strikes simply because it isn’t worth the fight to whoever is responsible.

    4. Citizens can resist. Go to protests, donate to political advocacy organizations (the ACLU will have its work cut out for it), and for Christ’s sake, go vote! Show up every year, just not every 4 years. Without the cooperation of congress, his power would be significantly curtailed.

    5. If nothing else, terms are limited. In 2 years we can swing congress. He isn’t going to be able to pass a constitutional amendment to do what he likes before that. If we swing congress in two years, it will slow him down significantly, and then we can replace him in 2028. Hopefully people will actually keep showing up long enough after that to reverse all the damage he’s likely to do in the next 4 years.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      The states have limited power to defy the feds.

      Case in point: legalized marijuana. That said, my fear in regards to states defying laws is:

      • Targeted attacks by MAGA terrorists, particularly regarding anything LGBTQ+ or reproductive healthcare related.
      • The fed withholding federal funds to punish states that don’t fall in line.

      The former is particularly concerning as police and the national guard are predominately right-wing. My state passed the SAFE-T Act to address abuses in the police/justice system. Naturally, various police departments weren’t happy about this, and through obtuse interpretation of the act they’ll claim they can’t legally do vital parts of their job – something I’ve seen multiple times first hand. Refusing to do their job competently in response to MAGA terrorism isn’t hard to imagine.

      The later gets tricky. Most of the states that would push back against unjust federal laws are also states that pay more in federal taxes than they receive in aid. The “obvious” solution withhold tax dollars going to the fed to make up the difference … which would be next to impossible in practice. Even if states mange to do it they’d be playing into Republican hands by defunding essential federal services.

  • Angrywaffle2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They will over the next 4 years. Elections swing back and forth. Midterms will probably be greatly fir democrats

    • AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      Yes, with full control over all 3 branches, fanatacist support groups and a stated desire to overthrow the previous norms and standards in order to build permanent total control, I’m sure the midterms and next election will totally take place and absolutely swing back to the Dems.

      Fucking hell.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Realistically? It’s too late.

    We now have an ultra-conservative SC for the rest of our lives. The Republican party openly stated and ran on making fundamental changes to our government if they won the House/Senate/Presidency and to “defeat the enemy within”.

    It doesn’t even really matter if the suffering that is coming shocks our society into rebounding in 4 years. The locked in SC and fundamental changes to our government will have already been set in place. Government departments will be run by appointees with absolutely no experience. Entire departments could be re-staffed with partisan political appointees if we are to believe the words of some of the people Trump promised to appoint. We have been placed squarely on the path to decline. That decline won’t happen overnight, but in our lifetimes it will become undeniable. We will probably barely recognize this country by the end of our lives.

    This election determined the political order we will live under for the rest of our lives.

    Buy a gun. Try to find happiness within your immediate sphere. And stay safe, if you can. Very, very few people will come out on top in the scenario we now find ourselves in. Give it a few years and you’ll see. They have total control now, so there’s no one else to blame for the decline that’s essentially guaranteed to become apparent in the near future. But I’m sure if they do fail, immigrants will be at the top of the blame list.

    It was a worthy experiment while it lasted.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    They don’t. It was never their country to begin with, clearly.

    The majority of the U.S. has been racist, bigoted, misogynists from the beginning. Hell, the entire electoral college system that just fucked everyone over is a compromise that was put into place because a bunch of rich white landowners in the Antebellum south couldn’t stand the idea of freed black men’s votes having as much power as theirs. So they immediately rigged the system to keep them in control of who gets power because you better believe no black man was ever going to be an elector.

    That is who your country is. There was a brief period from the 60s to the 80s where it became declasse to be an asshole, and so they mostly shut up during that time when they were in public, and then went home and took out their frustration by beating their wives and kids.

    Then along came the modern republican party, who began to tear down that cloak of respectability, and it emboldened all of those wife beating shit-heads to say “Hey…we can be assholes again…go us.”

    This is your America. It always has been. I’m sorry if that hurts. I really am. But right now I’m also goddamned angry at your country on behalf of my country and all the others that have to be caught in the blast.

    • x0chi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      That’s how I see it and I’m sure many like me (not us citizens) will start to see it. People aren’t being fooled, they like what they see in it when they voted. At least half Americans do

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Go to your Democratic party and demand change.

    Find a candidate that will stand on the basis of free healthcare, equal rights, the right to union, enforcing a higher minimum wage, enforcing paid sick leave and a minimum of 20 days holiday a year, and committing to lowering the cost of living.

    Once someone stands up for this, push them to the moon for the next four years. Tell anyone else NOT on this platform to fuck off.

    Essentially, America needs a Project 2029.

    • skysurfer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I like the sentiment, but that is predicated on there being another election under the same rule set which would allow either party to win. If things come to pass with the unitary executive theory outlined in Project 2025 and the dictatorship desires that have already been declared, makes it unlikely votes will work to change political parties going forward…

      • Murkbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Some of this outcome will depend on how effectively they execute. But let’s say they do. Then. in the paraphrased words of JFK:

        “He who makes reform impossible. makes revolution inevitable.”

        Now that isn’t a pretty future, or a nice future. But that’s what happens when a people resigns itself to performing democracy instead of protecting it.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And the “deep state”, meaning actual subject matter experts doing their jobs throughout government for years, regardless of current administration, are all going to be replaced by kid rock and vaping young republicans fresh from dropping out of their second semester in at The University of Southern Alabama State.

        That’s who’s going to be the dude inspecting your meat for e.coli and signing off on the clinical trials for you’ve perception meds - Gunner, Hunter and Ryder.

        Really don’t think anyone is considering the reality of how deeply fucked we’re going to be looking at the front door for obvious signs of trouble, while they leaf the crawlspace with fertilizer and gasoline and kick in the backdoor with flamethrowers in hand.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’ll also add that you need to primary basically anyone that has been in politics for more than 15 years. There is just too much, “common sense,” in this party that is just wrong. In 2016, it was smart to run a centrist campaign that tried to move moderates away from Trump, and it failed. In 2024, they ran the same fucking campaign, and it failed.

      There are well intentioned people that somehow still think that the 1992, third-way strategy will deliver gains through incrementalism, and it’s just not going to happen. Primary them, so that they at least have to contend with the new political realities. Trump picked up working class voters across across all demographics, not just the white working class. Everyone wants change; offer real change.