A three-year fight to help support game preservation has come to a sad end today. The US copyright office has denied a request for a DMCA exemption that would allow libraries to remotely share digital access to preserved video games.

“For the past three years, the Video Game History Foundation has been supporting with the Software Preservation Network (SPN) on a petition to allow libraries and archives to remotely share digital access to out-of-print video games in their collections,” VGHF explains in its statement. “Under the current anti-circumvention rules in Section 1201 of the DMCA, libraries and archives are unable to break copy protection on games in order to make them remotely accessible to researchers.”

Essentially, this exemption would open up the possibility of a digital library where historians and researchers could ‘check out’ digital games that run through emulators. The VGHF argues that around 87% of all video games released in the US before 2010 are now out of print, and the only legal way to access those games now is through the occasionally exorbitant prices and often failing hardware that defines the retro gaming market.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    19 days ago

    They really want to force gamers to buy their new games which are pretty much like the old games but now with extra helpings of ads, gambling mechanics and micro transactions on top

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      They really want to force gamers to buy the old games, just as they were, because those are next to free to adapt to a different platform and people will pay for them.

      Not to be my usual old codger, but a lot of these game in questions were microtransaction-based to being with, in the very Farmville-y format of charging you a quarter for each set of three lives and then being ungodly broken and difficult to make sure those three lives didn’t last any longer than a minute each and entice you to pay for three more.

      This absolutely sucks, is based on unjustifiable logic and takes the side of business over a demonstrable common good, but let’s not pretend the business logic behind it was invented in 2005. Game publishers have been game publishers longer than many of the nostalgic posters have been alive.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        They really want to force gamers to buy the old games, just as they were, because those are next to free to adapt to a different platform and people will pay for them.

        Nah, if they had wanted that, they would continue to release them in that format. As it stands, they don’t, so you can’t buy those old games from the publisher either.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 days ago

          They absolutely do. The market is full of remasters, remakes and re-releases. Having the originals readily available presumably diminishes the value of those, by the count of publishers.

          That is not the same as saying that old games are available. Most of them are not, the market keeps reissuing the same handful of hits and landmark games (although we’re in an era of deep cuts now, we even have a Pocky & Rocky remaster, somehow). But they can’t set up regulations where you are allowed to lend out Spider-Man vs. The Kingpin but not Resident Evil 2, so here we are.

    • zecg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 days ago

      The stories have also gone downhill to accomodate new bastard genres with fomo shit