• 8 Posts
  • 630 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle


  • Although Google making Chrome almost certainly had a part in it. For a while, you couldn’t use Google without a “try our new Chrome browser!” pop up in the corner, and there aren’t many who don’t use Google.

    Firefox doesn’t have the same advertising reach, and neither do they have the reputation of Google, as a big company to help them in the eyes of laymen. Basically everyone’s heard of Google, but less so Mozilla. You’d may as well ask them to install Konqueror, or Netscape for all the good that it would do.


  • T156@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldBe careful.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Or, session cookies. They don’t need special privilege to access, and if you grab all of someone’s cookies, you can probably get some valid session cookies for logged in accounts just by checking for some common domains in one/by keyword.

    From there, it would be trivial to get into email, social media, and other accounts to do other things with.



  • T156@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldBe careful.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This feature is extremely insecure now that there’s several AIs that can replicate voices. If a scammer calls you and you say a few words (like if you say “hello” and “sorry, I think you’ve got the wrong number”), a recording of that can be enough for them to replicate your voice.

    It honestly wasn’t really that secure to begin with, since the audio would have the daylights crushed out of it through the phone system. Though AI probably makes it easier by just letting you have a computer at the end of it spit out some words.

    Someone could probably get away with it by sounding vaguely enough like the person calling.

    Or just do the tried and true method of going through the in-person support. Voice recognition, at least in my experience, over the phone, has trouble with accents, so someone calling to get around that isn’t uncommon. It never works with me, for example, it just goes “please try again” until it redirects me to an agent.


  • T156@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldBe careful.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    From the Browser’s viewpoint, would there be any difference if the webpage has a JS button to put something in the clipboard, or it having code running in the background that puts things into the clipboard at page load?

    It’s not like there’s that much of a difference, as far as the Browser is concerned.


  • T156@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldBe careful.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Depends on how dedicated they are. It’s not implausible that some might just shuffle it away as “computer verification stuff”, and faithfully paste and execute the code, since it’s the computer doing a computery thing, that it says it is doing, and asks you to do, all must be well.


  • T156@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldOhio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    It probably only takes a staff on the order of a thousand people to make things go viral on the internet.

    Depending on the site, maybe less than that.

    It wasn’t all that long ago that Reddit had “power users” that was just a small handful of people/one person running an account that consistently made it viral on the site.


  • I have personally found generative-text LLMs quite good for creating titles. As an example, I have a few hundred tweets that I’m trying to put into a file, and I’ll use an LLM to create a human-readable name for them. It’s much better than a lot of the other summarisation mechanisms (like BERT) I’ve tried with it, but it’s still not perfect, because the model tends to output the same thing in slightly different words each time, so repeat runs will often result in the same thing with a different title.

    But, that is also a fairly limited use case.



  • T156@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldWhat's your radical opinion?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    The QWERTY-type keyboard is a dated relic, especially in the electronic era, where there aren’t physical mechanisms to jam because you pushed the buttons too quickly.

    This is particularly applicable to touch screens, where the format is particularly ill-suited, and ought to be replaced by something more suitable and intuitive.





  • That “little more complicated” is asking for a lot, though.

    Say you’re coming from Reddit, or Facebook, or something.

    It would not be unreasonable to believe that, like Reddit, every single Lemmy instance is its own separate, self-contained site.

    And that’s even before figuring out federation works, and how to access things from outside of your instance, or all the nuances that come with defederation and all of that. You made the mistake of joining beehaw? Whoops, all the other “subs” are now inaccessible, because beehaw is not connected to any of the others.

    Central places like Reddit don’t have that complexity. Reddit communities are singular, and there’s no overarching layer to complicate things. A community that disagrees with another, and blocks them doesn’t affect your experience as an user.


  • The decentralisation probably doesn’t help either. People coming to Lemmy from other places are coming from a centralised system. That takes some getting used to.

    If you’re new to this, you can be forgiven by thinking that all the Lemmy instances are their own separate thing, like the forums of old, rather than that they’re all interconnected (excluding a whole bunch of stuff about defederation and all of that mess).