So I’ve heard and seen the newest launch, and I thought for a private firm it seemed cool they were able to do it on their own, but I’m scratching my head that people are gushing about this as some hail mary.

I get the engineering required is staggering when it comes to these rocket tests, but NASA and other big space agencies have already done rocket tests and exploring bits of the moon which still astounds me to this day.

Is it because it’s not a multi billion government institution? When I tell colleagues about NASA doing stuff like this yeaaaars ago they’re like “Yea yea but this is different it’s crazy bro”

Can anyone help me understand? Any SpaceX or Tesla fans here?

  • farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    NASA could have done this if they had the budget. Instead we’d rather give huge tax cuts to billionaires so they can build a private sector NASA to charge NASA exorbitant sums to use their private vehicles. It’s the most asinine and innefficient way of going about it.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No, NASA has the budget. They already spent $50 billion on the development of SLS and Orion, Starship development cost is estimated to be around $10 billion.

      So in theory with the money they spent on SLS they could have built 5 starship program.

      The problem is that NASA has to follow political interests, sometimes the political interests align with technical interest and we get great things like the Apollo program.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They also have a very tight tolerance of failure. Every failure made in the engineering process brings more and more scrutiny by those holding the purse strings in Washington.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Space X has less bureaucracy and can pursue other commercial ventures. The amount nasa pays is high, but it’s still cheaper than continuing their old program

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Plus NASA can’t afford the risk. If SpaceX failed, no big deal. We would have lost some money and everyone would ridicule Musk. If NASA tried it and failed, they would not only have lost five times the money, but would be parylized by investigations, audits, cutbacks. NASA does a LOT more than just rockets and it would all be at risk

        Plus notice NASA has been investing in multiple commercial programs where possible. 3 big rocket programs. Two crew capsules and multiple cargo capsules. Multiple space stations, etc. NASA could not have created this redundancy on their own