Just imagine how much better everything will be once Trump no longer has a platform amplifying every inane thing that comes out of his mouth.
Honestly, the media will amplify this jerk because it generates clicks and views, and thus advertising dollars and engagement. It’d be nice if we didn’t amplify this jerk here at lemmy, but … well, I expect the ‘I do what I want hur’ response any minute now, so here we are. Trump amplified. The BS persists.
Well, I guess if there were any jerks that you don’t want to amplify, you could just stop talking about them so much. Don’t jerks love attention?!
I know for me personally, I just ignore the jerks and I keep on posting political news to this community because this is a political news community. Thank you! :)
Lol you obviously love attention more than most people here. Thank! :)
If that were actually true, then wouldn’t refraining from responding to me take away that attention? Thank you!
I wish that were true, but we still hear Hillary’s opinion on stuff and she lost four years ago. I imagine they’ll keep parroting Trump’s nonsense as long as it drives clicks. Frankly, I think we’ll have to put up with it until they plant his rotten carcass at one of his golf clubs.
Yep!
It’d def be interesting. But I think he’s always gonna have a platform–even after he loses, so we should probably prepare ourselves.
Hell hopefully be in jail. They don’t usually allow that.
Alas, he even owns one of them (Truth Social). But hopefully the wider media will stop reporting so much about him once he fades from importance…
In the sixty-two days since this account was created, it was made five thousand and three submissions to Lemmy.
That is once every seventeen minutes and fifty-one seconds, twenty-four hours a day seven days a week.
Considering that you can mute communities or users very easily,
I don’t see a problem with this.The submissions are on topic, even if I don’t necessarily agree with them all.Edit: After taking a closer look at exactly what is being posted, I retract my “don’t see a problem with this” statement.
They had a “MRTOW” (Men “”“Reclaiming”“” Their Own Way) community earlier this week, but it seems to have vanished, thankfully. From what I saw, it was just discount MGTOW while claiming not to be MGTOW
Hah hah hah hah hah.
Fuck you, fat ass
With how touchy the Mods are about us criticising Monk here, I suggest you clarify who the fat ass is. 🤣 It certainly applies to the Trumpster Fire, that’s for sure.
Oh gross. I didn’t even see who posted it. The vatniks running the account are spamming the community so much that he’s taken over every single post almost.
Pretty much…
I’ve never heard that word before. Thanks for teaching some russian words to me, friend! :)
Thanks for looking out for me! :)
Gets transcript, doesn’t see the lies that “everybody” claims she said in it, says that 60 minutes not only edited out that one thing he currently is obsessed with, but left it off their official transcript. Says “see, that is why I didn’t go on that show, even though every other candidate for decades has.” Trump supporters think he is thus the smartest candidate in decades.
From this article, using the Associative Property of GOP Accusations Equaling Confessions, we can deduce that Trump interviews are “deceptively edited”, Trump literally has no idea what he is talking about, Trump’s interviews are filled with “epic word salad”, and apparently the Trump campaign is violating campaign finance regulations.
Actually, I guess we didn’t learn anything new here.
Newsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Newsweek:
MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-kamala-harris-transcript-60-minutes-interview-1966167
