I think they’ve been watching too much porn.

  • SelfProgrammed@lemmy.world
    1455·
    1 month ago

    Kaboom is a fascist. They’ve been posting a lot more and I think it’s because the check from the Kremlin finally cleared.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      721·
      1 month ago

      Yup! There’s like 3 people who post in that fascist little community, and he is an open Christian Nationalist.

      It’s so funny to dunk on them though, because they seem to actually believe the bullshit that gets shovelled down their throats by the insane reactionary media they use to work themselves into a rage.

      They think they portray themselves like reasonable scholars, but to anyone outside their little bubble they sound like bath-salt snorting weirdos. Anything that cracks that bubble is deleted immediately by the chief weirdo who mods over there.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        10·
        1 month ago

        As a proud shit stirrer, I’ve got to say I’ve never seen a good take from that instance, but I’m also not entirely certain it’s not one person.

          • Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online
            31·
            1 month ago

            I don’t think any of them compare to lemmy.world. I’ve seen people openly right wing there, and I’ve seen them downvote people for no apparent reason other than being openly trans. I’ve been trying to report these incidents when they happen but I feel like it’s useless since they never do anything, even when the people are homed on their instance.

            • cmbabul@lemmy.world
              2·
              1 month ago

              Really? I’m not saying you’re lying but that’s not been my experience at all. I do block extremely liberally and have since I came here during the first reddexodus so maybe I’ve just stayed ahead of the idiot assholes

              • Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online
                21·
                1 month ago

                Probably, most of the ones on Lemmy.world are on the covert side, using dogwhistles and subtle language, to convey their points that most other people, mods included usually miss.

        • Zombiepirate@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          4·
          1 month ago

          I don’t want to link to it directly, but it’s pretty much the only conservative community on Lemmy.

      • SelfProgrammed@lemmy.world
        252·
        1 month ago

        I can’t imagine anything more “snowflake” than posting from a server that has disabled downvoted. They have no idea how universally hated their politics are.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        5·
        1 month ago

        I consider genocide to be.the dictionary definition, not his cherry picked personal definition

  • Juice@midwest.social
    601·
    1 month ago

    Cuckoldry has no temporal dimension

    If a conservative’s wife had sex with someone before she married him, the conservative is a cuck. In order to avoid this humiliation, conservatives advocate marrying children. This is consistent and inevitable logic

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.caEnglish
      7·
      1 month ago

      Is there a reason you use uncommon terms to refer to family members?

      Eg “wife’s son” vs “stepson”?

      Or was the kid your offspring and you just wanted to bait that loser?

      • Scratch@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        14·
        1 month ago

        It was 100% trolling. I’m not married and neither my partner nor myself have any children.

        It’s playing into the liberal soyboy cuck stereotype.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          7·
          1 month ago

          To be fair, I don’t think “wife’s son” is all that weird to begin with. I’d think it just means you aren’t close with your girlfriend’s kids yet.

          [edit] ‘wife’, married, right. I just realized. Still, I don’t think it’s that weird.

        • renzev@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          1 month ago

          Goodness, your trolling is god-tier! It’s so funny seeing how many people in this thread, including op, are taking your comment at face value. It’s satire of the highest level: easy to miss as a bystander, yet devastating to the target.

  • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.worldEnglish
    511·
    1 month ago

    Christ, Kaboom is embarrassing. Just on every level – as a man, as a person, as someone on lemmy, as a person who making jokes, just everything. God he’s embarrassing.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      271·
      1 month ago

      There really should be a word for someone who acts so tacky, but is unaware that they are doing so. I guess “conservative” will have to do.

      • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.worldEnglish
        22·
        1 month ago

        I think we need to use the ‘bootlicker’ word more, because we need to point out these are people stanning for rich people. So it’s some combination of ‘self-made slave,’ ‘cruel,’ and ‘tactless.’

        Either way, it’s like watching someone elses kid on the playground eating cat shit out of the sand box.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldEnglish
    46·
    1 month ago

    It takes a real man who is confident and loving enough to take someone else’s child in and treat them as their own. I can only hope that whomever my ex-wife gets serious with will do this for my children when they are with her. “It takes a village” after all.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      161·
      1 month ago

      Isn’t the OP the bull? It’s the OP’s wife’s ex who is the cuck. I’m not agreeing with the asshole but I think the definitions are mixed up.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      13·
      1 month ago

      Who else falls for the “strongman” gift.

      If you grow up without a dad, a man can go one of two ways:

      1. I’m going to have to be the dad I never had, for myself. I need to be the hero and source of love and safety he didn’t know how to give or provide.

      2. Yeah, new daddy’s right. Its all those damn women and immigrants fault.

  • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    5324·
    1 month ago

    Stop feeding the trolls.

    You really refer to your stepson as your wife’s son in casual conversation? That’s highly unusual. You can’t respond to a text conversation over the internet because you’re going to go do something for an hour or two? This is dishonest as fuck, the guy is clearly mentally handicapped based on the post history and you’re baiting him, be it consciously or unconsiously, so that you can farm fake internet updoot points.

    Stop filling the fediverse with your reddit tier personal drama. No one gives a fuck that a moron is capable of typing a post on internet. You’re acting a clown responding to it genuinely, and validating it with this blog post. This is how these people find the motivation to band together and make their little incel cults.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      327·
      1 month ago

      I’m not sure how successful they are at farming fake internet points when I’m the only other person who saw it and up voted it.

      You ok bud? Maybe avoid this community if you don’t want to see stupid drama? You know, since that’s the entire point?

      And for the record, laughing at reactionaries is absolutely the right way to deal with them; they are incapable of introspection, so exposing them as the fools they are keeps other people from falling for their bullshit.

    • kyle@lemm.ee
      17·
      1 month ago

      It’s not actually unusual to refer to them as such, especially if they didn’t go through a formal adoption process. I wouldn’t say it’s common where I’m from, but certainly not noteworthy.

      I don’t think we should feed the trolls either but suggesting OP is responsible for others making incel cults is extreme.

    • Classy@sh.itjust.works
      194·
      1 month ago

      Correct take. “Wife’s son” taken genuinely gives off very strong distancing vibes. It feels like he’s trying to disown or reject his relationship to the stepson. It’s kind of like when people say “baby mama” to refer to their current partner. No, there’s no direct link between them and myself: we’re just related by this other secondary relationship.

      “my wife’s _” is such a huge meme that it feels forced to even try reading it genuinely when a more organic way of wording it is available.

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      71·
      1 month ago

      IMHO you don’t get to call them that until they call you dad, and that doesn’t necessarily happen the moment you get married.

      My mother in law married someone while my wife was an adult. She would never call him dad, and he would never call her daughter, that doesn’t mean they aren’t family or aren’t close.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        2·
        1 month ago

        Nonsense, you call eachother how you see them. If my stepson doesn’t call me dad that’s fine, he’s still my stepson

    • bran_buckler@lemmy.world
      4·
      1 month ago

      Stepson might involve some kind of adoption, or, I don’t know… My dad remarried when I was in my late teens, but I didn’t see him much. His wife has never been referred to as my stepmom, etc, but my situation might be different due to a lack of closeness. The OP clearly has some kind of relationship with the kid since they are going to pick them up, but I can see how they might not have that kind of label.