• 56!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    From my experience, environmentalists don’t like large construction projects of any kind.

    Edit: This comment is based on growing up with environmentalist parents who strongly dislike HS2.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Funny, as I’m a staunch environmentalist, and I’m fine with large projects if they have a few things:

      • a purpose that serves society (and not just shareholders)
      • a plan for mitigating environmental impacts (e.g., and environmental impact assessment --> environmental management plans)
      • A compensation and offsetting plan for impacts that can’t be mitigated
      • A plan for closure and reclamation
    • Phineaz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      It depends on the kind. There are groups that would prefer to see human presence reduced to a speck so nature can thrive. There are groups that somehow care for one single bog or meadow but fail to see the bigger picture. There are also those that simply want to protect everything and do support large projects provided they fulfill a lot of regulations. There are also people such as myself who have given themselves to Realpolitik: Local environmentalism is pointless if global protection fails (some drama added for effect)

      • 56!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are groups that somehow care for one single bog or meadow but fail to see the bigger picture

        This is mainly what I was thinking about. People care a lot more about things local to them, rather than a railway which probably won’t have any nearby stations.