• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    They are, because they’re made up of humans with human health risks. The shareholders just dont realize that yet.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah things will clear up just in time when their food runs out. Just wait.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      “The shareholders” usually equates to a couple of insanely wealthy majority holders. The rest are mostly just regular people with regular people opinions of things.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        This means nothing except that we are all implicated on the destruction of the planet. Burn the Altars of Wall Street and the world will heal.

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can always dig a canal to bring flooding into the business district, think outside the box!

    This is obviously a crude attempt at a joke and not real advice.

    • Curious Canid@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depending on the source, Wall Street is somewhere between 3 and 25 feet above sea level. It wouldn’t take much to dampen the market’s spirit. :-)

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ it should be acceptable to subject to capital punishment.

    If one is found to have behaved in a destructive or sociopathic way, its capital should be seized, socialised or auctioned off, and the proceeds primarily put toward remediation.

    Corporations are more amoral than immoral, their undesirable behaviours are typically the result of the incentives they’re rewarded for exhibiting. It would also help if their involvement in the creation and policing the rules they’re expected to follow were severely diminished.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not really convinced that this would change their behavior much tbh, given that corporations are already prone to sacrificing their own financial future for short term profit increases, despite existing for nothing but financial gain.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Corporation is just a group of people extracting value on behave of the “owners”

      The “leadership” always serves themselves first, that’s the entire point of the gig.

  • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If waste and pollution would count as cost, you’ll see this effect. Now they benefit that people all over the world bare their costs

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is one reason it is so wild that corporations in the US are entitled to “free speech” (in the form of spending) after the Citizens United decision. They get benefits as if they were a person, but far fewer of the natural restrictions.

  • Kadaj21@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I guess if they’re considered “rich”. I just figured out I’m technically middle class and I ignore most health issues. Granted i don’t smoke, drink alcoholic drinks rarely, or have any sort of entertainment budget or discretionary monies for extracurriculars.

    If obly there were a way to pass off my CC debts like corporations lol.