“After extensive consultation, discussion, and deliberation, the American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force has decided to encourage American Muslims to vote for any presidential candidate of their choosing who supports a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and a US arms embargo on the Israeli government, such as candidates Dr Jill Stein, Dr Cornel West or Chase Oliver,” read the statement, obtained by Middle East Eye.

The statement was written by the American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force, an umbrella group formed this year that consists of a number of prominent Muslim organisations including the political arms of Americans for Justice in Palestine (AJP), Cair, and the US Council of Muslim Organizations.

“We cannot endorse Vice President Kamala Harris’ candidacy because of her refusal to even consider imposing the arms embargo on the Israeli government required by US laws and her failure to promise any other changes whatsoever to President Biden’s failed policy of steadfast financial, diplomatic and military support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza,” the statement read.

    • anarcho_blinkenist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Hey, bud, I’m betting the actual Muslims who are affected probably have a better grasp of the situation and their values and associated risks/benefits behind their own advocacy and politics than your (presumably highly privileged) disconnected-from-their-struggle self; and inserting yourself to belittle them as if you know better than they theymselfs what’s ‘good for them,’ is a very chauvinist and colonialist outlook and a reinforcement of white supremacist norms and attitudes. You should try listening rather than projecting and belittling.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        None of that has anything to do with it.

        This is the issue at hand: https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

        There’s a legitimate mathematical limitation on 3rd parties under first past the post voting, the way America does elections. Until we get ranked choice voting and the ability to vote intelligently that it would unlock, failing to vote for Kamala is voting for trump.

        • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          failing to vote for Kamala is voting for trump.

          No, it’s literally not. A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. A vote for Cornel West or Jill Stein is exactly a vote for Cornel West or Jill Stein.

          If you want to argue the math and the practicality of who people vote for in our current system, fine, but don’t gaslight people by telling them that their vote for one candidate is actually a vote for a different candidate.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            No, it’s literally not.

            1. This has been explained many times

            2. Learn a second adverb.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There was an article posted in another magazine thread that spoke about needing to iterate America’s core values. What are they? Freedom to starve and be homeless, or be locked up and become a chattel slave, or work several jobs as s wage slave; freedom of press owned by a handful of superwealthy people and corporations, many of whom are in the energy and arms industries; freedom of low quality food that contain carcinogenic pesticide residues, colors, flavors and growth hormones and routine antibiotics. Freedom to die from easily treatable conditions because you can’t afford care of medications, even if you purchase mandated Medicare?

        Justice? For whom? The people who are incarcerated because of fabricated evidence of having to take plea deals because you can’t afford a good lawyer? The ones executed, despite exculpatory evidence? How about executive branch government members who lead insurrection, or legislators that make insider trading legal for themselves but not us, or of the legislative branch who take gifts of great monetary value and have loans forgiven?

        How about too big to fail industries?

        Freedom of speech? Two tiered.

        Profit at the expense of all else; making sure the USD remains the world reserve currency, by manufacturing fake wmds to invade a sovereign nation, so that nation would not convert their UN food-for-oil account from petrodollar to Petroeuro? Taking foreign money to defeat more progressive candidates that would absolutely vote not to support genocide with money, weapons, air support? Conveniently forgetting concern over certain nations’ infatuation with Nazi idealism to continue the tired red scare propaganda?

        Guns!

        What are America’s core values?

      • BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Unfortunately we have a 2 party system.

        A or B

        A sucks and B is much worse

        Voting for C or abstaining is a passive endorsement of the greater of the two sucks.

        If you and the Muslim community want to hump for a third party, good, let’s fucken talk about getting that started…

        The day AFTER Election Day. —

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The day after election day. The day on which you no longer have any leverage.

          Liberals and an inability to grasp electoralism. Name a more iconic duo.

          • BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You want a seat at the table you don’t start at the top you start at the bottom.

            Where is the Green Party for the three years preceding each presidential election cycle?

        • escapesamsara@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Today is after election day, buddy. You had your chance to listen to those actually effected by trump and Biden. You didn’t and think everyone magically forgot what trump was like, so you try to scare monger so your chosen neoliberal nightmare grey’s elected and nothing improves ever.

          • BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Both candidates are shit, one is way worse

            Do what you want, obviously, it’s just stupid in my opinion to enable the worst possible choice directly or indirectly. Unless you don’t live here, then I guess it matters less, maybe not at all… except if you’re Greenland and trump tries to buy you again, then you’re screwed 🤷‍♂️

      • Podunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Did you just assume their religion?!? And nationality? And race?

        Shut the fuck up.