With membership at new lows and no electoral wins to their name, it’s time for the Greens to ditch the malignant narcissist who’s presided over its decline.

“With membership at new lows and no electoral wins to their name, it’s time for the Greens to ditch the malignant narcissist who’s presided over its decline.”

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      8·
      2 months ago

      Do you not know what a state dinner is?

      Wow, you found one of the millions of photos of The President of the United States dining with another world leader. Congrats.

      What was Jill’s excuse?

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        47·
        2 months ago

        She went to an RT party, was investigated by the Senate Intelligence Committee, and excused. Don’t vote for her if you don’t want to. I won’t, because I’m in a swing state. But the dis/mis information and slandering of third parties should be disconcerting for anyone who wants more choices in this duopoly.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          2·
          2 months ago

          RT

          So literally the Kremlin’s propaganda arm. Totally normal stuff…

          After all, she was a government official at the time, so it’s normal for her to dine with the Russian president. Oh wait, she wasn’t?

          Well at least she was a major presidential candidate right? Oh, never more than ~1.4% you say?

          Well I’m sure Putin and his oligarch buddies just wanted to meet her because they’re big fans 🙄.

          I have a hard time believing any of you Jill Stein shills are actually for real. I really hope you’re not.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            11·
            2 months ago

            I’m not voting for Jill Stein. Again, she was investigated. They found no wrongdoing. Russia did support her campaign because it sows division. AIPAC donates to Harris and Trump. Facts, not feelings and speculation, should dictate reasoning.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      2·
      2 months ago

      Do we really have to explain the difference between public officials who work in foreign policy and directly represent the United States, versus private citizens?