• hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Arguably ‘russia’s economy’ is a word combination without obvious linguistic problems

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Only if you’re a landlocked Central Asian country with no other avenues for more trading opportunities with the wider world.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even then, it seems smarter to go with China or India since those countries will actually consume the raw materials being produced by these countries.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The economic and political infrastructures between Russia and Central Asian states are already well established thanks to history, which makes both parties still rely on each other. But the connection between Central Asia and China and India is not well established, which makes more immediate realignment difficult for Central Asians. The Belt and Road Initiative is still in its infancy in Central Asia. But even then, many analysts say the BRI infrastructures in Central Asia has not been profitable for China. Many say the real purpose of BRI in Asia is to provide back up trading route for China, if South China Sea ever becomes a war zone too dangerous for shipment towards the country.