Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agoClaudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballotwww.msn.comexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down152
arrow-up1-48arrow-down1external-linkClaudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballotwww.msn.comSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months ago I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility. Actually this is what I’m arguing. It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.
minus-squareblazera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoYes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 months agoNot according to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
minus-squareblazera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoRight, same as in Russia. Its obvious BS
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoI don’t think Russia has a Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
minus-squareblazera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoA state body regulating elections. it was even a ruling that decided some signatures werent allowed.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoCan you try this comment again because I’m not picking up what you’re putting down.
minus-squareblazera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoThe exact same thing that happened in Pennsylvania. A state body ruling that some signatures werent allowed, so the candidate is barred from participating in the election.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoI thought it was in the constitution that the state runs its elections?
Actually this is what I’m arguing.
It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.
Yes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.
Not according to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Right, same as in Russia. Its obvious BS
I don’t think Russia has a Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
A state body regulating elections. it was even a ruling that decided some signatures werent allowed.
Can you try this comment again because I’m not picking up what you’re putting down.
The exact same thing that happened in Pennsylvania. A state body ruling that some signatures werent allowed, so the candidate is barred from participating in the election.
I thought it was in the constitution that the state runs its elections?