• lennybird@lemmy.worldEnglish
    56·
    11 days ago

    Fun fact: DonOLD the Con once said the Emmys were rigged because The Apprentice kept losing to The Amazing Race LOL.

  • JordanZ@lemmy.world
    12·
    11 days ago

    I mean obviously he’s the sure win. He starts slender and gets wider, not to mention fat is more buoyant than muscle. He’s gonna cut through that water like a boat! Those other guys are shaped all wrong.

    • jake_jake_jake_@lemmy.world
      762·
      11 days ago

      it’s the attitude that one side says both sides have, but we know they (and you) already live in an invented reality anyway.

      • SirSoy@lemmy.world
        5103·
        11 days ago

        Sadly no. The reality is both sides are demonizing each other to the point where both feel comfortable portraying the other as the enemy. It’s terrifying if you have even a modicum of common sense. Just cause someone likes a different politician doesn’t make them a Nazi, a communist, or any of the words the left and right are throwing around. It’s not normal. And pretending it is is just weird.

        • czech@lemm.ee
          833·
          11 days ago

          You’ve introduced a lot of noise around the simple fact that only one candidate is unwilling to accept the results of the election. It’s scary that you can convince yourself otherwise with enough distraction.

        • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          393·
          11 days ago

          Don’t try to normalize fascism, pissant. No one here believes you “have a modicum of common sense”, so just give it a fuckin’ rest. Your opinion is shite and you should feel like shite for voicing it. Hush now.

          • SirSoy@lemmy.world
            448·
            11 days ago

            The fact that you have no idea what my political leanings are or who I’m supporting, nor would you ask and you feel ok calling another person a fascist simply for pointing out the behavior on both sides says more about you than it does me.

            • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
              262·
              11 days ago

              It’s pretty clear you’re okay with propping up actual fascism. That alone makes the rest of your arguments fall flat.

              No one with any actual principles is going to listen to the side screaming for the annialation of trans people. (One of many reasons to reject far right ideologies entirely.) How is that so hard to understand for you?

              • SirSoy@lemmy.world
                412·
                11 days ago

                Honestly I try to be centrist but I lean a little left. I think socialized healthcare is good thing, but I think it should be run at the state level cause each state will have different needs. I think bodily autonomy should be a right for everyone. I think that there should be a limit on millionaires. Hell I think they should put a limit on CEOs too like you can only earn x times the lowest paid employee. I think gun crime is an issue but I think focusing on the tool used instead of the socioeconomic, mental, and societal factors is a mistake. I want us to do something about or deficit but both parties seem intent to just spend spend spend these days. And I definitely don’t think attacking others over their beliefs or sexual orientation, is OK. If I had to choose a party I’d say I lean more towards the Democrats

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  172·
                  11 days ago

                  I try to be centrist

                  There’s your problem right there: if you try to mold your principles to fit a false narrative of “the middle point is always rational”, you’re going to risk developing some highly irrational ideas, such as thinking that fascism is normal conservatism and it’s calling it out that’s abnormal.

                  think socialized healthcare is good thing, but I think it should be run at the state level cause each state will have different needs

                  Or such as thinking that the politicians in charge of states like Mississippi, Texas or Delaware** are honest and always put the needs of the majority of the people over the wants of rich donors.

                  I think gun crime is an issue but I think focusing on the tool used instead of the socioeconomic, mental, and societal factors is a mistake

                  Or such as thinking that the many other causes of violent crime (all of which need to be addressed, of course) aren’t greatly exacerbated by guns being easier to access than health care, voting, or library books that acknowledge the existence and value of minority groups.

                  I want us to do something about or deficit but both parties seem intent to just spend spend spend these days

                  Or thinking that the deficit and how much political funding happens matters anywhere near as much as WHAT’S being funded

                  ** Delaware is the most corporation-friendly of all the states. That’s why almost all of them are registered there regardless of where they’re actually based.

        • Frog@lemmy.ca
          331·
          11 days ago

          Nazis only support one side. That one side didn’t say they were against Nazis.

          That is weird. It’s not normal.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldEnglish
          282·
          11 days ago

          That’s bullshit. Democrats all over the place are saying this is likely to be a close election and people really need to get out and vote to beat Trump.

          The only sense it’s true that Democrats are taking about it being rigged are that actual, known attempts to rig it, like the fake electors scheme and the storming of the capital, along with the grotesque gerrymandering, all of which is verifiable.

          • cybervseas@lemmy.worldEnglish
            8·
            11 days ago

            The big one you missed are efforts to purge voter rolls and require all kinds of ID to be allowed to vote. Birth certificate to register is ridiculous.

        • okwhateverdude@lemmy.worldEnglish
          20·
          11 days ago

          I do not agree with your assessment of “reality.” Only one side is actively against bodily autonomy (especially for women) and wants to look at kids genitals and police which toilet a human shits in. Only one side courts the religious ethnostate fascist where their whole stance is in-group vs. out-group (aka, demonization). Pointing these out isn’t demonization, these are facts. If someone likes politicians from that side, the odds are good it does indeed make them suitable for the various negative labels they don’t like. The late Dr. Bob Altemeyer studied right wing authoritarianism (both the leaders and followers) and even developed a rubric that would predict right wing authoritarian followers. They are dangerous because they eschew reason for vibes and are extremely susceptible to demagogues.

          Give this a read and see if it changes your opinion on “both sides”

          https://theauthoritarians.org/

    • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
      16·
      11 days ago

      I’m confused.

      What prominent figures on the left have said something to the effect of “If we lose, the election was rigged!”??

      I can only think of prominent figures on the right who have made statements like this.

      Or are you saying that those who are against the 2 party system typically fall under the thinking that the election is rigged?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
      162·
      11 days ago

      There’s a very slight, very marginal, barely noticeable difference between liberals commenting on the SCOTUS decision to halt the recount in Bush v Gore circa 2000 and conservatives baselessly claiming millions of illegal ballots were cast in the state of California in 2016, preventing the incoming President from claiming both the EC majority and the popular vote win.

      I would not describe these as perfectly identical attitudes toward an electoral contest.

      • danc4498@lemmy.worldEnglish
        7·
        11 days ago

        Also, republicans doing everything they can to suppress votes. Including things like

        • Changing identification rules unnecessarily resulting in people not getting to vote who have voted for literally decades the same way.
        • Aggressively wiping voter roles knowing it will affect democrats more than republicans.
        • Bring on a Post Master general to start dismantling mail sorting machines significantly slowing down the mail… Right after stats showed democrats were much more likely to vote by mail.

        All this bullshit happens and democrats will bitch about how unfair it is, but will still accept the results.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          11 days ago

          Democrats will tell you that if they lose, it was your fault for not voting hard enough.

          Voters will tell themselves the problem was a bunch of evil foreigners who tricked Republicans into doing what they’ve been doing since Nixon.

          Republicans will insist they secretly won California and suggest someone needs to “cut down the tall trees” during the next election.

          • danc4498@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            10 days ago

            Sounds pretty fuckin different to me. This isn’t a “both sides” argument.

            Democrats accept the results but aren’t happy with it. Republicans don’t accept the results. And honestly, this feels like it has only become central to so Republicans are since Trump came along.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              10 days ago

              Democrats accept the results

              Liberals meekly surrender to a judicial coup while conservatives threaten to lynch the VP who steps out of line.

              I want to believe there’s a happy middle ground. But I’m not giving credit to Vichy Democrats who whined about Nader while rubber stamping Bush’s Patriot Act.