• Joshua Purba@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      What does “material analysis” means in this context? What should I search to know more? I searched the term and only came up with chemistry topics.

      • Sagittarii@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Simply put, materialism — as opposed to idealism — is the idea that everything we do and experience as a society (our history, culture, politics, etc) is shaped by the material reality around us, rather than ideas.

        “Material analysis” in this case therefore means analysing politics and history through this lens. And it’s a fundamental component of socialism/marxism.

        Simple diagram of how our material reality shapes our society

        Yogthos is insulting liberals because liberalism is an idealist ideology that always eventually gives way to fascism when a capitalist state is (inevitably) in decay.

        • Joshua Purba@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thank you for the explanation. Hopefully I learn something from the reference you linked. I’ll watch the video first before reading the literatures.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        My original comment is meant to refer to the concept of Materialism, which contains the concepts of Marxist Dialectical and Historical Materialism. Materialism is a “reality-focused” branch of philosophy and analysis, contrasted with Idealism, which is idea-focused.

        The connection to liberalism and fascism is because Liberalism is Idealist as opposed to Materialist. The Liberal answer to “where does fascism come from?” Would be “demagogues like Trump rising to power, racism, xenophobia, etc,” yet when you ask why those ideas are present or not present, the Liberal cannot answer genuinely.

        For Marxists, fascism is a consequence of Capitalism’s decline, resulting in the Petty Bourgeois elements of society, ie the “Middle Class,” sliding into worse conditions and allying with the Bourgeoisie against the Proletariat. In the Weimar Republic, Capitalism was declining and genuine Communism was gaining steam, with the KPD at the forefront and the SPD representing the moderate Socialists, so fascism gained power as a reaction. Communism and Socialism gained appeal among the Lower Classes while fascism gained power among the Liberals, ie the Middle and Upper Classes.

        The other works listed by other commenters are great, but my personal favorite work on the subject is Elementary Principles of Philosophy.