• Karl Auerbach@sfba.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    @ProPublica@newsie.social OK, assume that the law requires certification, that it is not discretionary. Then assume that the person refuses to certify, that a judge says “you must certify”, that person says “no way”, the judge says “I am jailing you for contempt until you do”. And the person chooses martyrdom and still refuses and refuses and refuses while remaining in jail for contempt.

    What happens?

  • jonathanpeterson@hachyderm.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    @ProPublica@newsie.social A century of prior law? 50 years of prior law did nothing for Roe V. Wade. The GOP courts have decided that might makes right.