Programmers: false
true
0
Can confirm. Am a programmer and my first thought was that mathematicians had recently come up with one of their wacky proofs that 2 does not equal 2, like how 1 is equal to 0.
1 == 0.9999999…
This is why fonts and kerning are so very important. But then again, the text in the boobs looks like it has extraneous spaces deliberately to look like that. There is a noticeable visual difference between
2! = 2and2 != 2when spaced properly.deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Damn, I’m so dumb it hurts
me too but you were brave enough to ask
2 != 2
But what if it’s true? Perhaps the 2 on the left is integer and the right one is character.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
“!” in math is the factorial symbol, and 2 factorial is just 2 times 1, which is 2.
Whereas != is commonly used in programming as “not equal to”.
So the mathematician see two factorial equals two, which is true.
The programmer sees two is not equal to two, which is not true.
factorial
Damnit. Got me. I’ve been a programmer for the better part of nearly 20 years but I was a math-heavy engineer first and I still freaking read that as “two-factorial”.
This is actually a great interview question
If both are horny enough, they won’t even see the characters and only see the cleavage.
What do the breasts have to do with anything?
They help you focus on what’s important
I can find breasts 24/7, math problems not written on top of em
It really depends on where the methaphorical comma is.
Wouldn’t mathematicians also see this as false?
4 = 2 is not correct.
deleted by creator
Now I look stupid, but I promise, I’m just too tired to think straight.
It’s not 4. Wiki has a table and more info
