• Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The logical next step is to implement a system that works better than apples; something less vulnerable to rot. Anyone know how to measure merit behind closed doors? Me neither, so obviously complete transparency matters. If you murder someone but I let you decide what officially happened and what the punishment is, are you going to spend the rest of your life in prison? No? You don’t decide that? Well clearly the better system needs external auditing.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    “waaaaahh it’s not a proper meme weaaahhh”

    Let’s just save some time here.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      What is a proper meme anyways?

      In the 90s we had a meme.

      “WAZZZZUUUUPPPPP!!!”

      And everybody did it, as they danced the macarana, and ate that taco bell dog…wait…

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fun fact: chihuahuas probably began as livestock. The Aztecs ate them. I let my Chiweenie know that on a regular basis when he’s a naughty boy that he could easily be dinner.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s some stupid zoomers who think that macro images are what memes are and they have zero concept of memetic epidemiology. A meme is an idea that spreads via a simple means of expression. That’s it. It’s containerized thought.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I would call them niave zoomers.

          Niave means you haven’t been taught something. This is the world they were born into. They cannot understand a world without the internet, nor cell phones.

          Stupid is when you’re taught something, and you cannot grasp it.

          Very few young people seek out concepts they don’t understand, and even fewer seek out concepts they don’t know if it exists.

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Information being out there, and them having seen it aren’t the same thing. Who taught all the zoomers these things? Did you know that the reason most fast food besides McDonalds has Pepsi and not Coke is because at various times in history Pepsi would buy different fast food businesses, before making them exclusively Pepsi, and selling the brand?

              That information is out there…but did you ever see it?

              Or what about the myth that Coca Cola the soft drink DIDN’T originally contain cocaine, and also didn’t start off as what we think of as a soft drink. It started off as an unregulated medicine for indigestion, with extracts from the Coca plant. But at no time did a carbonated cola with cocaine ever get sold to the public.

              That information is out there too.

      • joneskind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m a 46 yo French dude and still throw an unexpected “Wazzuuuuppp” on phone from time to time just to keep that vibe going. It was as stupid as innocent. An hymn to my past youth and a rallying call for generations to come.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It was more a 2000s thing as the ad campaign stretched from 99 to 02

        Edit: and I confirmed that it started at the end of December 1999

        • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m pretty sure it’s more a distinction between people who focus on personal liberties and especially private property vs collectivism and socialism. Basically lots of people aren’t for right wing fascism but still want to own private property, view their personal comforts more important than necessarily the needs of others (NIMBYs I think count here) etc.

          This could be as simple as not liking property damage in protests, still preferring cars and trucks to public transportation, not liking high occupancy buildings in your area etc, at least that’s how I’ve gleaned it as someone who doesn’t use that kinda label myself.

          I could be wrong, but that’s how it feels to me. Closer to centrist or even just original form of libertarian, which some have labeled as being a bit more left wing than US libertarians.

          • briercreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Who decides what property damage to cause? If I disagree with someone can I smash their car windows?

            • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I gave a deduced definition, not an endorsement. I will say that I view human rights and human life as more important than private property, but I am in no way encouraging people to harm or steal from someone they just don’t like.

              When someone asked me what I’d do about someone stealing an A/C unit off a house if I didn’t have a gun, my answer was basically “I would not kill someone over an a/c unit.” I stand by that statement.

          • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            yes. thank you for a more nuanced viewpoint. i’d have to agree with your assessment, even if i don’t agree with the principle.

            for me, living in a society requires being part of a collective (in the modern world). i prefer many of the things that the ‘true libertarian’ prefers, but i don’t expect society to provide my selfish desires. that’s why i choose rural over urban. but the suburbs are part of am urban landscape, so if someone wants to live that NIMBY life, that need to make sure their backyard is far away from the other backyards. i realize that is getting harder and harder to do, which is why i dream of a secular society where we can practice a humanitarian from of birth control, because ultimately, a healthy life just isn’t possible when we are crowded into tight spaces. humans need room to breathe and express themselves.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Pretending that the police isn’t all bad is a pretty damn liberal thing to do.

      Fuck the police. Each and every one of these class traitors.

      • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        where in the fuck are you getting that this is a liberal thing? you must be european. these terms don’t have the same meaning in america.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          where in the fuck are you getting that this is a liberal thing?

          Sorry, did you have something to say?

          these terms don’t have the same meaning in america.

          No, Clyde… liberal ideology is the same liberal ideology everywhere.

          The fact that you are more brainwashed than even the average European doesn’t change squat.

                • masquenox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I don’t advocate for political racketeers, Clyde.

                  Which part of…

                  I don’t advocate for political racketeers, Clyde.

                  …didn’t you understand the first time around?

                  Where did you get the idea that licking the boots of a bunch of political elites qualify as “advocating” for anything, Clyde? That is… unless you are advocating for licking politician boot?