They probably only had margarine croissants left.

The distinction is land vs capital. Plenty of economists talk about the problem you mention.

He’s talking about exports

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_exports_of_Australia

Controlling the natural resources a country and leasing it out it private companies is pretty standard practice in most non corrupt countries. Norway probably differs in that they capture more of the economic rent in part due to a more efficient tax and a share of public ownership.

It’s also pretty evident that we could not sustain the current population on preindustrial farming let alone hunter gathering.

More than 2 I think

Were there any discrepancies when you looked at the issues?

It depends the infrastructure costs required for the new development is more than what they recover. If it’s less and reducing them encourages more development then it gives them more revenue overall.

India is building a ton of solar as well.

Typically it’s pretty low risk in comparison to other loans which is why home loans are relatively low but there’s a risk that both the property value declines and the outstanding loan and selling costs is more than property value.

No one is actually burying trees. What happens is that after the contract ends they can just cut down the trees, release the carbon and start again.

I do agree with better regulation but forrestry ones should just go.

paid a buddy of mine to plant trees.

It’s actually worse than that they are paying people to not cut down trees. It’s the same logic when my GF says she saved $200 because the dress was half price.

How thick is your paper?

Degrowth is too pesimistic for me. The EU has shown you can reduce carbon emissions while increasing GDP we just need the right incentives.

Historically too without the Haber process we would be able to support the current population on the Earth today but we can as a result of it.

It sounds like they are approving all the permits anyway so whether it’s illegal or not it doesn’t seem to matter.

The one good thing about these policies is they are bypassing a lot of council regulations to increase supply but the “affordable” rentals are probably pretty marginal benefit and it’s likely just low income kids who’s parents are supporting them.

Don’t people switch to using subscribed pretty soon anyway? All is full of junk for me.

Where do they do it otherwise? In Australia it’s also yearly.

People might also get bonus so in some sense you get paid once a year.

Congrats, great DE choice too

By easing they mean the inflation rate has dropped it’s still way above the target range.