I don’t get what this statement is getting at in relation to the above post?

Title feels like clickbait. Would be more convinced it was deliberate clickbait if the thumbnail didn’t directly show the sign saying “negro” and not the actual slur.

But that just makes the choice of title more confusing.

Ah, kph/“kills per hour”. My favorite American unit of speed.

Perhaps you could say that if you arbitrarily remove any nuance or qualifications at all from the statement.

A reasonable person would see a message advising women to hide who they vote for from their signficant others and question why they (Harris’s advisors) thought the message would land. And what that says about the people those women are married to.

Did any famous people dodge the draft (and also underachieve their whole life) and succeed? I need a more achievable role model.

It does?

Yeah, he could refuse to finish even a single thought.

Made significantly more difficult because the American president is the one doing the asking.

No need for (a). That’s barely a cover and certainly not part of his racist mathematics.

I’ll give him a select list of hearts I want him to dance-fight his way through.

Subtitle A: “The dancing just went from ‘dirty’ to ‘deadly’.”

Subtitle B: “Watch out, he’s changed his shoes.”

Talibangelical cats. Like Rumtumtugger, Mr. Mistoffelees, and the Nefarious Netanyahu.

If my tail wouldn’t be prehensile, then I’d want it remove too. It’s a sartorial mess with no upside.

I imagine the difference is a between “why” and “why not”.

A generally educated couple might encounter the question of “Is there I reason why I should have kids?”, decide “yes, because I’d like to”, and have 1-3 kids. More poorly educated couples encounter the question “is there a reason why I should not have kids?”, decide “no”, and have 2-3 more.

If you’re a cheater, it all makes sense.

A melondick is not the kinda dick you want

That depends on your values. If your values say quantifying how much workers stand to gain if they shut down exorbitant C-suite wages, then good for you.

36% doesn’t tell a clean story. How many dozens of percentage raise would workers get if that CEO’s raise was evenly distributed?

Their own citizens, I’d assume

This has to be fake. No one would combine these.

I don’t recall the full episode but a few things stood out.

• it would be cold as hel, so properly strapping a lifevest around some flotsam seems iffy
• isn’t saltwater more buoyant or is that old fishwife’s tale? Also idk if that test body of water is salty.